A Multi-Criteria Analysis Model under an Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Environment with an Application to Production Project Decision Problems | ||
| Journal of Quality Engineering and Production Optimization | ||
| مقاله 4، دوره 3، شماره 1، فروردین 2018، صفحه 43-66 اصل مقاله (1.1 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22070/jqepo.2018.2402.1049 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Y. Dorfeshan1؛ S. Meysam Mousavi* 2؛ Behnam Vahdani3 | ||
| 1Shahed University | ||
| 2Khalije Fars Highway | ||
| 3Islamic Azad University | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) to solve complicated decisions often includes uncertainty, which could be tackled by utilizing the fuzzy sets theory. Type-2 fuzzy sets consider more uncertainty than type-1 fuzzy sets. These fuzzy sets provide more degrees of freedom to illustrate the uncertainty and fuzziness in real-world production projects. In this paper, a new multi-criteria analysis model is introduced based on new compromise ratio and relative preference relation methods by vicinity to positive ideal and distance from negative ideal concepts under an interval type-2 fuzzy environment. Also, qualitative criteria are expressed as linguistic variables. Relative preference relation is more reasonable than defuzzification, because defuzzification cannot provide preference degree between two fuzzy numbers and cannot keep all the information. In this paper, an extended relative preference relation over the average is presented to deal with numeral values. Finally, a real application to designing and manufacturing of small electronic components, particularly for the aviation, defense, and space industries, is adopted from the literature and solved to determine the critical path by considering efficient criteria such as time, cost, risk, and quality. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM)؛ Interval type-2 fuzzy sets (IT2FSs)؛ Relative preference relation؛ Compromise ratio method؛ Production projects؛ Critical path selection problem | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Amiri, M., & Golozari, F. (2011). Application of fuzzy multi-attribute decision making in determining the critical path by using time, cost, risk, and quality criteria. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 54(1), 393-401.
Castro-Lacouture, D., Süer, G. A., Gonzalez-Joaqui, J., & Yates, J. K. (2009). Construction project scheduling with time, cost, and material restrictions using fuzzy mathematical models and critical path method. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(10), 1096-1104.
Chen, S. J., & Chen, S. M. (2003). A new method for handling multicriteria fuzzy decision-making problems using FN-IOWA operators. Cybernetics &Systems, 34(2), 109-137.
Chen, S. M., & Lee, L. W. (2010). Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on the ranking values and the arithmetic operations of interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Expert Systems with applications, 37(1), 824-833.
Chen, S. M., & Wang, C. Y. (2013). Fuzzy decision making systems based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Information Sciences, 242, 1-21.
Flouris, T., Lock, D. (2008). Aviation project management. Ashgate Publishing Limited, Hampshire.
Fu, G. (2008). A fuzzy optimization method for multicriteria decision making: An application to reservoir flood control operation. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(1), 145-149.
Han, Z. Q., Wang, J. Q., Zhang, H. Y., & Luo, X. X. (2016). Group multi-criteria decision making method with triangular type-2 fuzzy numbers. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 18(4), 673-684.
Hu, J., Zhang, Y., Chen, X., & Liu, Y. (2013). Multi-criteria decision making method based on possibility degree of interval type-2 fuzzy number. Knowledge-Based Systems, 43, 21-29.
Khalaf, W. S. (2013). Solving the fuzzy project scheduling problem based on a ranking function. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 7(8), 806-811.
Kiliç, M., & Kaya, İ. (2015). Investment project evaluation by a decision making methodology based on type-2 fuzzy sets. Applied Soft Computing, 27, 399-410.
Lee, H. S. (2000). A new fuzzy ranking method based on fuzzy preference relation. In Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 2000 IEEE International Conference on. Vol. 5, (pp. 3416-3420).
Lee, H. S. (2005). A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making model for the selection of the distribution center. Advances in Natural Computation, 439-439.
Lin, F. T., & Yao, J. S. (2003). Fuzzy critical path method based on signed-distance ranking and statistical confidence-interval estimates. Journal of Supercomputing, 24(3), 305-325.
Madhuri, K. U., & Chandan, K. (2016). Applying the Fuzzy Critical Path Method to Manufacturing Tugboat.
Mehlawat, M. K., & Gupta, P. (2016). A new fuzzy group multi-criteria decision making method with an application to the critical path selection. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 83(5-8), 1281-1296.
Mendel, J. M. (2007). Type-2 fuzzy sets and systems: An overview [corrected reprint]. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine, 2(2), 20-29.
Mendel, J. M., John, R. I., & Liu, F. (2006). Interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems made simple. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 14(6), 808-821.
Mohagheghi, V., Mousavi, S. M., & Vahdani, B. (2017). Analyzing project cash flow by a new interval type-2 fuzzy model with an application to construction industry. Neural Computing and Applications, 28:3393–3411.
Mohagheghi, V., Mousavi, S. M., Vahdani, B., & Siadat, A. (2017). A mathematical modeling approach for high and new technology-project portfolio selection under uncertain environments. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 32(6), 4069-4079.
San Cristóbal, J. R. (2011). Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a renewable energy project in Spain: The Vikor method. Renewable Energy, 36(2), 498-502.
Sanayei, A., Mousavi, S. F., & Yazdankhah, A. (2010). Group decision making process for supplier selection with VIKOR under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(1), 24-30.
Shemshadi, A., Shirazi, H., Toreihi, M., & Tarokh, M. J. (2011). A fuzzy VIKOR method for supplier selection based on entropy measure for objective weighting. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(10), 12160-12167.
Tavana, M., Mavi, R. K., Santos-Arteaga, F. J., & Doust, E. R. (2016). An extended VIKOR method using stochastic data and subjective judgments. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 97, 240-247.
Vahdani, B., Hadipour, H., Sadaghiani, J. S., & Amiri, M. (2010). Extension of VIKOR method based on interval-valued fuzzy sets. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 47(9-12), 1231-1239.
Wang, Y. J. (2014). A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model by associating technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution with relative preference relation. Information Sciences, 268, 169-184.
Wang, Y. J. (2015). Ranking triangle and trapezoidal fuzzy numbers based on the relative preference relation. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 39(2), 586-599.
Wang, Y. J. (2015b). A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model based on simple additive weighting method and relative preference relation. Applied Soft Computing, 30, 412-420.
Yager, R. R., & Xu, Z. (2006). The continuous ordered weighted geometric operator and its application to decision making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 157(10), 1393-1402.
Yuan, Y. (1991). Criteria for evaluating fuzzy ranking methods. Fuzzy sets and Systems, 43(2), 139-157.
Yücenur, G. N., & Demirel, N. Ç. (2012). Group decision making process for insurance company selection problem with extended VIKOR method under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 3702-3707.
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and control, 8(3), 338-353.
Zadeh, L. A. (1975). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning—I. Information Sciences, 8(3), 199-249.
Zammori, F. A., Braglia, M., & Frosolini, M. (2009). A fuzzy multi-criteria approach for critical path definition. International Journal of Project Management, 27(3), 278-291.
Zimmermann, H. J. (1991). Fuzzy set theory: And its applications, 2nd ed., Kluwer, Boston, MA. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 439 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 493 |
||