Akbari Neisiani, S., Ehtesham, H., Taghizad, H., & Daneshvar, H. (2021). Position of scientific articles produced by the Cancer Institute of Tehran University of Medical Sciences in terms of weight: a scientometric study. Scientometrics Research Journal, 7(1), (Spring & Summer), 217-234. https://doi.org/ 10.22070/rsci.2020.5124.1348 [In Persian].

Bornmann, L. (2020). How can citation impact in bibliometrics be normalized? A new approach combining citing-side normalization and citation percentiles. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(4), 1553-1569. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00089

.................., & Haunschild, R. (2016). Normalization of Mendeley reader impact on the reader-and paper-side: A comparison of the mean discipline normalized reader score (MDNRS) with the mean normalized reader score (MNRS) and bare reader counts. Journal of informetrics, 10(3), 776-788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.04.015

……, & Marx, W. (2015). Methods for the generation of normalized citation impact scores in bibliometrics: Which method best reflects the judgements of experts?, Journal of Informetrics, 9(2), 408-418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.01.006

Cheng, Z., Xingfu L., Xiong X., Chuanyi, Wang, C., (2021). What Can Influence the Quality of International Collaborative Publications: A Case Study of Humanities and Social Sciences International Collaboration in China’s Double First-Class Project Universities. Social Sciences. 10, 109. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10030109

Elsevier (2016). International Comparative Performance of the UK Research Base: A report prepared by Elsevier for the UK’s Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy (BEIS).  Online access: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/performance-of-the-uk-research-base-international-comparison-2016

Huggett, S., James, C., & Palmaro, E. (2018, January). Field-weighting readership: How does it compare to field-weighting citations? In International Workshop on Altmetrics for Research Outputs Measurements and Scholarly Information Management, pp. 96-104, Singapore: Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1053-9_8

Ioannidis, J. P., Boyack, K., & Wouters, P. F. (2016). Citation metrics: a primer on how (not) to normalize. PLoS biology, 14(9), e1002542. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002542

Jang, H. (2021). Relationship between publication indicators and citation impact indicators for publications in business, management, and accounting listed in Scopus from 2015 to 2019. Science Editing, 8(1), 18-25. https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.225

Liu, Y., Ma, J., Song, H., Qian, Z., & Lin, X. (2021). Chinese universities’ cross-border research collaboration in the social sciences and its impact. Sustainability, 13(18), 10378. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354839765_Chinese_Universities'_Cross-Border_Research_Collaboration_in_the_Social_Sciences_and_Its_Impact

Mingers, J., & Meyer, M. (2017). Normalizing Google Scholar data for use in research evaluation. Scientometrics, 112(2), 1111-1121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2415-x

Osareh, F., Soheili, F., & Keshvari, M. (2020). Comparison of the Experts’ Perspec-tives to SciVal Database’s FWCI Index in Identification of Top Authors (Case Study: Top Iranian Authors in Fundamental Sciences Area from 2013 to 2018). Scientometrics Research Journal, 6(1), (Spring & Summer), 77-98. https://doi.org/10.22070/rsci.2019.3875.1244 [In Persian].

Purkayastha, A., Palmaro, E., Falk-Krzesinski, H. J., & Baas, J. (2019). Comparison of two article-level, field-independent citation metrics: Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and Relative Citation Ratio (RCR). Journal of Informetrics, 13(2), 635-642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2019.03.012

Sugimoto, C. R., & Weingart, S. (2015). The kaleidoscope of disciplinarity. Journal of Documentation, 71(4), 775-794. https://doi.org/10.1108/Jd-06-2014-0082

Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K. (2021). Researchers’ attitudes towards the h-index on Twitter 2007–2020: criticism and acceptance. Scientometrics, 126(6), 5361-5368. https://doi.org/‌10.1007/s11192-021-03961-8

Waltman, L., & Van Eck, N. J. (2015). Field-normalized citation impact indicators and the choice of an appropriate counting method. Journal of Informetrics, 9(4), 872-894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.08.001

Waltman, L., & Van Eck, N. J. (2019). Field normalization of scientometric indicators. Springer handbook of science and technology indicators, 281-300. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_11

Zanotto, E. D., & Carvalho, V. (2021). Article age-and field-normalized tools to evaluate scientific impact and momentum. Scientometrics, 126(4), 2865-2883. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03877-3