https://doi.org/10.35050/JIPM010.2016.018

................... .، سهیلی، ف.، فرج‌پهلو، ع.، و معرف‌زاده، ع. (139۱). بررسی سنجه مرکزیت در شبکه هم‌نویسندگی مقالات مجلات علم اطلاعات. پژوهش‏نامه کتابداری و اطلاع‏رسانی، 2 (2)، 181-200. https://doi.org/10.22067/riis. v2i2.13610

 

 

Alonso-Valdivielso, M.Á., Antonio, E.G. (2010). Why Include Bibliometric Analysis in the Activities of a Library Specialized in Astronomy? - Notes from the Libraries of INTA. [Conference: 6th Library and Information Services in Astronomy Location: ‏ Pune], INDIA Date: ‏ FEB 14-17. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ASPC..433...95A/abstract

  

Andrikopoulos, A., & Economou, L. (2015). Editorial board interlocks in financial economics. International Review of Financial Analysis, 37: 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2014.11.015

Baji, F., & Osareh, F. (2015). An Investigation into the Structure of the Co-authorship Network of Neuroscience field in Iran, using a Social Network Analysis Approach. Journal of Studies in Library and Information Science, 6(14), 71-92. https://slis.scu.ac.ir/article_11313.html [In Persian].

Bashkoh, A., Ekrami, M., Soheili, F., & Karimi, A. (2020). Study of the Effects of Co-Authorship Strategies on Scientific Productivity of Researchers in Distance Education: Application of social network analysis method and social capital paradigm. Scientometrics Research Journal, 6(12), 79-102.

https://doi.org/10.22070/rsci.2019.4471.1294 [In Persian].

Beck, M. T. (1978). Editorialstatement. Scientometrics, 1(1), 1-2.

Birkle, C., Pendlebury, D.A., Schnell, J., & Adams, J. (2020). Web of Science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity. Quantitative Science Studies, (1), 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00018

Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., & Daniel, H.D. (2008). Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59: 830–837. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20806

Borzo, C. (2017). Russian aerospace technology 60 years after Sputnik, on the path of growth or stagnation? Spash, Access at: https://espash.ir/?p=11275 (April 19, 2022). [In Persian].

Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674843714

Callon, M., Courtial, J.-P., Turner, W. A. & Bauin, S. (1983). From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information, 22(2), 191-235. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901883022002003

Ganguli, R. (2008). A scientometric analysis of recent aerospace research. Current Science, 95(12), 1670-1672. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292477713_A_scientometric_analysis_of_recent_aerospace_research

Cheng, B. (2006). Using social network analyses to investigate potential bias in editorial peer review in core journals of Comparative/International Education. [PhD. Dissertation], Brigham Young University.

Clarivate (2021). Researcher Recognition. Available at:  https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/researcher-recognition/ (March 29, 2021)

Codina, L., Morales-Vargas, A., Rodríguez-Martínez, R., & Pérez-Montoro, M. (2020). Uso de Scopus y Web of Science para investigar y evaluar en comunicación social: análisis comparativoy caracterización. index. comunicación, 10(3), 235-261.

Comprehensive scientific map of the country (2010). Supreme Council of Cultural Revolution, comprehensive scientific map of the country: 1-24. [In Persian].

Cotta, C., & Merelo, J.J. (2007). Where is evolutionary computation going? A temporal analysis of the E.C. community. Genet Program Evolvable Mach, 8, 239–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10710-007-9031-0

Danesh, F., Abdulmajid, A. H., Afshar, M., Mousavifar, S., & Farhadi, F. (2022). Correlation between Scientific Output and Collaboration among LIS Scholars around the World [as Reflected in Emerald Database]. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 25(1), 5-22. https://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/article_699000.html [In Persian].

Danesh, F., & GhaviDel, S. (2021). A Century of Scholarly Collaboration by Brucella and Brucellosis Researchers: A Scientometric Study. Scientometrics Research Journal, (Articles in Press), 1-‌29. https://doi.org/10.22070/rsci.2021.14770.1514 [In Persian].

Dabiri, F., Noroozi Chakoli, A., & Asadi, S. (2020). Evaluation of Scientific Collaboration of Iranian Researchers in the Field of Microelectronics Science and Technology in the Scopus Database in 2000-2017. Scientometrics Research Journal, 6(12), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.22070/rsci.2019.3933.1251 [In Persian].

Ebrahimi, S., Afifian, F., & Goltaji, M. (2018). Does Knowledge Sharing in ReseachGate Scientific Network Increase Research-ers’ Productivity Indicators? Case Study of Top World Physicists. Scientometrics Research Journal, 4(8), 57-72. https://doi.org/10.22070/rsci.2018.614 [In Persian].

Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (2008). An h-index weighted by citation impact. Information Processing and Management, 44: 770–780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2007.05.003

Fadaie, G., & Hassanzadeh Kamand, H. (2010). Evaluation of Scientific Publications of Faculty Members of Human Sciences Department in Tabriz University during 2002-2007. Research on Information Science and Public Libraries (RISPL), 16 (2), 157-175. https://www.sid.ir/paper/88748/fa [In Persian].

Freeman, L.C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7

Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2004). Analyzing scientific networks through co-authorship. Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, 257-276, Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2755-9_12

Guns, R., & Rousseau, R. (2009). Real and rational variants of the h-index and the g-index. Journal of Informetrics, 3, 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2008.11.004

Galyani-Moghaddam, G., & Taheri, P. (2015). Mapping co-authorship network and scientific collaborative coefficient of Iranian researchers in the field of aerospace in the Science Citation Index to 2014. Knowledge Retrieval and Semantic Systems, 2(3), 23-42.  https://jks.atu.ac.ir/article_1606.html [In Persian].

Hanneman, R. A. & Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. In R. A. Hanneman & M. Riddle (ed.), University of California, Riverside. (Accessed 2 Mar 2012).

Hariri, N., & Nikzad, M. (2022). Co-authorship networks of Iranian articles in library and information science, psychology, management and economics in ISI during 2000-2009. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 26(4), 825-844. https://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/article_699077.html [In Persian].

Haseli, D., Ghavidel, S., & Riahinia, N. (2021). Kharazmi University Scientific Publications and Co-authorship Networks in Web of Science (1994-2020). Human and Information Interaction, 8(1), 1-19. http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.24237418.1400.8.1.6.5 [In Persian].

Hirsch, J.E. (2019). hα: An index to quantify an individual's scientific leadership. Scientometrics, 118, 673–686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2994-1

Inkpen, A.C., Tsan, E.W. (2005). Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Academy of management review, 30(1): 146-165.  https://doi.org/10.2307/20159100

Khasseh, A.A. (2014). The structure of knowledge in the field of quantitative studies: the study of co-citation, co-authorship, and synonyms of scientific productions based on the approaches of network analysis and visualization of science. [Doctoral dissertation in information science and epistemology], Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Payam Noor Mashhad University, Mashhad. [In Persian].

Library and information encyclopedia (2009). Tehran: National Library of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 1385-1381. [In Persian].

Liwei, Z., & Chunlin, J. (2015). Social network analysis and academic performance of the editorial board members for journals of library and information science. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 9(2), 131-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/09737766.2015.1069947

Mazurek, J. (2018). A modification to Hirsch index allowing comparisons across different scientific fields. Current Science, 114, 2238–2239. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1703.05485

Mostafavi, I., & Azh, M. (2021). Investigating the Impact of International Scientific Cooperation on Increasing the Quality of Scientific Outputs of Iranian Researchers in the Web of Science Database. Scientometrics Research Journal,  [Article in Press]. https://doi.org/10.22070/rsci.2021.13871.1477 [In Persian].

Noroozi Chakoli, A. (2009). Application of bibliometric methods and indicators in scientific studies. Ayar, 22, 49- 72. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.26767503.1388.14.22.4.0 [In Persian].

Osareh, F. (2006). Collaboration in Astronomy Knowledge Production: A Case Study in ScienceDirect from 2000-2004 In: P. Ingwersen, B. Larsen (Eds), Proceedings of ISSI 2005 – the 10th International [Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics], Vol. 2, Stockholm, Sweden, 24-28 July 2005, Karolinska University Press, 2036, 660-661. https://www.issi-society.org/proceedings/issi_2005/Osareh_ISSI2005.pdf

………….., Noroozi Chakoli, A., & Keshvari, M. (2022). Co-authorship of Iranian Researchers in Science, Social Science, Art and Humanities Citation Indexes in the Web of Science between 2000 and 2006. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 25(4), 573-595. https://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/?_action=article&au=2857954&_au=%DA%A9%D8%B4%D9%88%D8%B1%DB%8C%D8%8C%20%D9%85%D8%B1%DB%8C%D9%85&lang=en [In Persian].

……………, Soheili, F., farajpahlo, A., & moarefzadeh, A. (2012). A survay on centrality measure in co-authorship networks in information science journals. Library and Information Science Research, 2(2), 181- 200.  https://doi.org/‌10.22067/riis. v2i2.13610 [In Persian].

Pelicioni, L.C., Ribeiro, J.R., Devezas, T., Belderrain, M.C.N., & Melo, F.C.L. (2018). Application of a Bibliometric Tool for Studying Space Technology Trends. J Aerosp Tecnol Manag, 10(830): 3-8 . https://doi.org/10.50.28/jatm. v10. 830

Perry, M., & Reny, P. J. (2016). How to count citations if you must. American Economic Review, 106, 2722–2741. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20140850

Rahimpour, N., Mohammadi, M., & Ghassemi, A. (2018). Citation analysis and network drawing of schizophrenia-related articles. Caspian Journal of Scientometrics (CJS), 5(2), 56- 65. https://doi.org/10.22088/cjs.5.2.56 [In Persian].

Rezaei-Haghighi, M., Danesh, F., Shabankareh, K., & Hamidi, A. (2020). Assessment of Scientific Publications of Iranian Researchers in the Field of Myocardial Ischemia Diseases Based on the Indicators of Ideational Influence and Social Influence. Health Information Management, 17(2), 80-86. https://doi.org/10.22122/him. v17i2.4101 [In Persian].

Rousseau, R., & Ye, F. (2008). A proposal for a dynamic h-type index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59, 1853–1855. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20890

Sadegh Vishkaee, M., Esmaili Givi, M. R., & Nakhoda, M. (2018). A Study on the Impact of International Scientific Mobility of the University of Tehran Faculty Members on Their Re-search Performance and Scientific Col-laborations. Scientometrics Research Journal, 4(7), 37-58. https://doi.org/10.22070/RSCI.2018.638 [In Persian].

Scott, J. (2000). Social network analysis: A handbook (2nd Ed.). London: Sage.

Sharafi, A., & Shaghaghi, A. (2021). Drawing the Scientific Collaboration Map of Intellectual Capital Field in the Web of Science. Caspian Journal of Scientometrics (CJS), 8 (2), 41-51. https://doi.org/10.22088/cjs.8.2.41 [In Persian].

Soheili, F., & Osareh, F. (2014). A Survey on Density and Size of Co-authorship Networks in Information Science Journals. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 29(2), 351-372. https://doi.org/ 10.35050/JIPM010.2014.038 [In Persian].

........................................... (2010). Examining scientific publications of Razi University faculty members in science citation index during 1992-2008. Journal of Studies in Library and Information Science, 1(4), 81. https://www.sid.ir/paper/211695/fa [In Persian].

............................................. (2013). Concepts of Centrality and Density in Scientific and Social Networks. Librarianship and Information Organization Studies, 24(3), 92-108.  http://46.209.25.211/article_64.html [In Persian].

Soheili, F., Sharif Moghaddam, H., Mousavi Chelak, A., & Khasseh, A. A. (2022). An Evaluation of iMetric Studies through the Scholarly Influence Model. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 32(1), 25-50. https://doi.org/10.35050/JIPM010.2016.018 [In Persian].

Stefano, D.D., Giordano, G., & Vitale, M.P. (2011). Issues in the analysis of co-authorship networks. Quality & Quantity, 45(5),1091-1107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9493-2

Tajedini, O., Soheili, F., & Sadatmoosavi, A. (2022). The Centrality Measures in Co-authorship Networks: Synergy or Antagonism in Researchersâ Research Performance. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 34(3), 1423-1452.  https://doi.org/10.35050/JIPM010.2019.044 [In Persian].

Taheri Daulatabadi, B., & Qadawi, R. (2013). Visualization of Iran's scientific publications in the field of aerospace based on the co-occurrence of words using the web of science database, an article presented at the 6th ADKA [conference (Theoretical and applied concepts of scientology: from science to practice)], 5-6, November, Education Center Shahid Heydari (Mashakh House), Tehran. [In Persian].

Van Eck, N.J., & Waltman, L. (2008). Generalizing the h- and g-indices. Journal of Informetrics, 2: 263–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2008.09.004

Van Noorden, R. (2010). Metrics: A profusion of measures. Nature, 465, 864–866. https://doi.org/10.1038/465864a

Vasfi, M., Mohammadian, S., & Bamir, M. (2014). Analysis of the Conceptual Structures and Text Mining Scientific Outputs of Political Science: with Emphasis on Islamic Studies. Quarterly Journal of Political Research in Islamic World, 4(1), 123-140. https://doi.org/10.20286/priw-0401123

Vavilova, I.B., Zievako V.S., Pakuliak L.K., & Potapovych L.P.  (2020). “Space Science and Technology” journal: Statistics and Scientometrics for 1995–2020. Space Science and Technology, 26(6): 094-103. https://doi.org/10.15407/knit2020.06.094

Vaziri, I., & Rajabali Baglo, R. (2010). Aerospace engineering of Iran and the world in the mirror of scientology: studies in citation databases, [paper presented at the 10th conference of the Iranian Aerospace Association], March 10-12, Tehran. [In Persian].

……….. (2010). Iranian science in the subject group of aerospace engineering at the international level: a scientometric study based on the statistics of the Institute of Scientific Information (ISI). Special issue of the conference on the employment status of aerospace graduates, 26 October, Amirkabir University, Tehran. https://civilica.com/doc/134766 [In Persian].

Web of Science Core Collection (2021). Categories & Collections (Scope Notes). Available at: Available at: https://mjl.clarivate.com/help-center (April 25)

Yaminfrooz, M., & Gholinia, H. (2015). Multiple h-index: A new scientometric indicator. Electronic Library, 33(547), 556. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-07-2013-0137

 

Yoosin, K., Yeonjin, SeongGwan., & Seung, R.J. (2017). Practical Text Mining for Trend Analysis: Ontology to visualization in Aerospace Technology. KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems, 11(8): 4133-4145. https://doi.org/10.3837/tiis.2017.08.022