Abramo, G., Aksnes, D. W., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2020). Comparison of research performance of Italian and Norwegian professors and universities. Journal of Informetrics, 14(2), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2020.101023

Campbell, D. T. (1979). Assessing the impact of planned social change. Evaluation and Program Planning, 2(1), 67–90. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/014971897990048X

Cicero, T., & Malgarini, M. (2020). On the use of journal classification in social sciences and humanities: evidence from an Italian database. Scientometrics, 125(2), 1689–1708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03581-8

Course, S. (2000). Literature and society. Translated by Gholamreza Arjamandi. Peyk Noor, 6 (Summer), 13-25. [In Persian]

Davarpanah, M.R. (2007). Scientometric Challenges in Humanities and Social Sciences. Studies in Education and Psychology, 8(2), 125. https://doi.org/10.22067/IJAP.V8I2.6799 [In Persian].

Eslami Ardakani, H. (2013). Fatness or swelling; an analysis of (non)scholarly articles in humanities. Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities, 19(74-75), 91-118. https://ensani.ir/fa/article/322512 [In Persian]

Gadd, E. (2019). Influencing the changing world of research evaluation. Insights, 32(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.456

Ghanadinezhad, F. & Heidari, G. (2020). Methods and Indicators for the Evaluation of Scientific Production in the Humanities and Social Sciences: A Systematic Review. Scientometric research journal, 6(12), 203-230.  https://doi.org/10.22070/RSCI.2020.4998.1341 [In Persian]

Hosseinpour, M. (2012). The Research Pathology of Faculty Members in Human Sciences. Irainian Journal of The Knowledge Studies in The Islamic University, 16(50), 45. https://ensani.ir/fa/article/304672/ [In Persian]

Jamali Mahmouei, H.R. (2010). Bibliography of scientometrics. Iranian Research Institute for Information Science and Technology (IranDoc). 79 p. [In Persian]

Ku, M.-C. (2019). A Comparative Analysis of English Abstracts and Summaries of Chinese Research Articles in Three Library and Information Science Journals Indexed by the Taiwan Social Science Citation Index. Journal of Library & Information Studies, 17(1), 37–81. https://doi.org/10.6182/jlis.201906_17(1).037

Lin, C.-S. (2018). An analysis of citation functions in the humanities and social sciences research from the perspective of problematic citation analysis assumptions. Scientometrics, 116(2), 797–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2770-2

Namdarian, L., Kalantari, N. & Alidousti, S. (2017). Evaluation of science, technology and innovation: a review of indicators and active organizations in this field. Tehran: Chapar. 404 p. 978-964-7519-73-1 [In Persian]

Noroozi Chakoli, A. (2011). Introduction to scientometric: foundations, concepts, relations & origins. Tehran: Samt. 502 p.  [In Persian]

Ochsner, M., & Hug, S. E. (2016). Indicators for Research Performance in the Humanities? The Scholars’ View on Research Quality and Indicators. [International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators], Valencia: Spain. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.11431.14245

Ochsner, M., Hug, S. E., & Daniel, H.-D. (2014). Setting the stage for the assessment of research quality in the humanities. Consolidating the results of four empirical studies. Z Erziehungswiss, 17(6), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-014-0576-4

Olmos-Peñuela, J., Benneworth, P., & Castro-Martinez, E. (2014). Are ‘STEM from Mars and SSH from Venus’?: Challenging disciplinary stereotypes of research’s social value. Science and Public Policy, 41(3), 384–400. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/sct071

Paryad, R. (2008). Challenges facing research in the field of human sciences. National Congress of Human Sciences, Tehran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies. [In Persian]

Rasuli, B., & Shahriari, P. (2021). Barriers to Research in the Humanities in Iran: a window to Science Policy. Information Sciences & Technology, 37(2), 333-361. https://doi.org/ 10.52547/JIPM.37.2.333 [In Persian]

Safarpour, E., Abbaspour, J., & Salimi, G. (2021). Exploring the Experiences and Views of Shiraz University’s Art and Humanities faculty members on Promotion Regulation. Journal of Knowledge-Research Studies, 1(1), 29-54. https://doi.org/10.22034/jkrs.2021.47805.1006 [In Persian]

Samadi, L. (2020). Analyzing the Necessities of Equating the Value of Scientific Outputs of Specialized Fields in Scientometrics and Pathology of Similar Measurement and Evaluation: Case Study: Field of Art. Rahyaft Journal, 30(77), 1-24. https://doi.org/ 10.22034/RAHYAFT.2020.13817 [In Persian]

Samadi, L., Nakhoda, M., Noroozi Chakoli, A., & Asadi, S. (2018). Citing and citations Issues in the assessments of Art: Challenges and Problems: Case Study Painting. Journal of Studies in Library and Information Science, 10(1), 77-94. https://doi.org/10.22055/slis.2017.18543.1252 [In Persian]

Samadi, L.; Nakhoda, M., Noroozi Chakoli, A. & Asadi, S. (2019). The Challenges of the Regulations for the Promotion of Faculty Members for the Equated Comparison of the Assessment and Evaluation Process of Scientific Productivity of Music Researchers in Iran. Library and Information Science Research, 9(1), 59-84. https://doi.org/ 10.22067/RIIS.V9I1.75959 [In Persian]

Schreibman, S., Siemens, R., & Unsworth, J. (2004). A Companion to Digital Humanities. Oxford: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470999875

Sheikhzade, H. (2015). Human sciences, transformation and promotion in line with national interests. [Paper presented at the International Conference on New Approaches in Human Sciences, Malaysia]. https://civilica.com/doc/439581/ [In Persian]

Sigurðarson, E. S. (2020). Capacities, capabilities, and the societal impact of the humanities. Research Evaluation, 29(1), 71–76. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvz031

Sīle, L., Pölönen, J., Sivertsen, G., Guns, R., Engels, T. C. E., Arefiev, P., Dušková, M., Faurbæk, L., Holl, A., Kulczycki, E., Macan, B., Nelhans, G., Petr, M., Pisk, M., Soós, S., Stojanovski, J., Stone, A., Šušol, J., & Teitelbaum, R. (2018). Comprehensiveness of national bibliographic databases for social sciences and humanities: Findings from a European survey. Research Evaluation, 27(4), 310–322. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvy016

Taqizadeh Kerman, N., Hosseinqolizadeh, R., & Javidi Kalate Ja’farabadi, T. (2015). A Pathological Study of Knowledge Creation in Humanities Research Centers. Strategy for culture, 8(30), 161-188. https://www.jsfc.ir/article_14951.html [In Persian]

Tayefehbagher, D., Abazari, Z., Moradi, S. & Babalhavaeji, F. (2022). A Model for Evaluating the Impact of Humanities Research in Iran. Scientometric research journal, 8(15), 1-34.  https://doi.org/10.22070/RSCI.2020.13384.1450 [In Persian]

Toledo, E. G. (2018). Research assessment in Humanities and Social Sciences in review. Revista española de Documentación Científica, 41(3), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2018.3.1552

Wilsdon, J., Allen, L., Belfiore, E., Campbell, P., Curry, S., Hill, S., Jones, R., Kain, R., Kerridge, S., Thelwall, M., Tinkler, J., Viney, I., Wouters, P., Hill, J. & Johnson, B. (2015). The metric tide: report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management. Higher Education Funding Council for England. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4929.136

Yang, S., Zheng, M., Yu, Y., & Wolfram, D. (2021). Are Altmetric.com scores effective for research impact evaluation in the social sciences and humanities? Journal of Informetrics, 15(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2020.101120

Yasini, A., Norouzi Kuhdasht, R., & Tabban, M. (2017). Pathology of Academic Research Using Anatomical Mixed Method (The Case of Literature and Humanities, and Theology Fields). Irainian Journal of The Knowledge Studies in The Islamic University, 21(71), 231-250. https://www.magiran.com/paper/1741979/ [In Persian]