جمالی زواره، بتول، نصر، احمدرضا، و آرمند، محمد (1387). معیارهای ارزیابی کتاب‌های درسی دانشگاهی. پژوهش و نگارش کتب دانشگاهی، سال سیزدهم (1)، 9-31.

حریری، نجلا، و فیروزی، نگار (1393). تحلیل استنادی کتاب‌های درسی پزشکی سایت آمازون از نظر استناد به مقالات دانشکده‌های داروسازی دولتی ایران. مدیریت اطلاعات سلامت، سال یازدهم (2)، 190-198.

رضی، احمد (1388). شاخصه‌های ارزیابی و نقد کتاب‌های درسی دانشگاهی. پژوهش و نگارش کتب دانشگاهی، سال چهاردهم (1)، 21-.

سارلی، ناصرقلی (1383). کتاب درسی دانشگاهی و معیارسازی زبان. پژوهش و نگارش کتب دانشگاهی، سال هشتم (4)، 9-.

ملکی، حسن (1385). مبانی و معیارهای نقد کتاب درسی دانشگاهی. پژوهش و نگارش کتب دانشگاهی، سال یازدهم (1)، 9-20.

نوذری، سودابه، حری، عباس، حریری، نجلا، و منصوریان، یزدان (1392). تحلیل استنادی منابع کتاب‌ها درباره حافظ. مطالعات ملی کتابداری و سازماندهی اطلاعات، سال بیست و چهارم (1)، 52-75.

یارمحمدیان، محمدحسین، آرمند، محمد، و زارعی، هاجر (1389). ارزیابی کتاب‌های درسی دانشگاهی علوم انسانی بر اساس شاخص‌های مطلوب کتاب‌های درسی دانشگاهی. پژوهش و نگارش کتب دانشگاهی، سال پانزدهم (1)، 36-58.

.Abrizah, A., & Thelwall, M. (2014). Can the impact of non-‏‏‏‏‏Western academic books be measured? An investigation of Google Books and Google Scholar for Malaysia. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(12), 2498-‏‏‏‏‏2508. doi:doi:10.1002/ asi.23145

Bollen, J., Rodriquez, M. A., & Van de Sompel, H. (2006). Journal status. Scientometrics, 69(3), 669-687.

Boyack, K. W., & Klavans, R. (2014). Including cited non-source items in a large-scale map of science: What difference does it make? Journal of Informetrics, 8, 569-580. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2014.04.001

Chen, P., Xie, H., Maslov, S., & Redner, S. (2007). Finding scientific gems with Google’s PageRank algorithm. Journal of Informetrics, 1(1), 8-15.

Chi, P. S., Jeuris, W., Thijs, B., & Glänzel, W. (2015). Book Bibliometrics – A New Perspective and Challenge in Indicator Building Based on the Book Citation Index. Paper presented at the ISSI 2015-The 15th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Turkey.

Cronin, B., Snyder, H., & Atkins, H. (1997). Comparative citation rankings of authors in monographic and journal literature: A study of sociology. Journal of documentation, 53(3), 263-273.

Finkstaedt, T. (1990). Measuring research performance in the humanities. Scientometrics, 19(4/5), 407-417.

Furnham, A. F. (1990). Quantifying quality: An argument in favour of citation counts. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 14(2), 105-110.

Griggs, R. A., & Christopher, A. N. (2016). Who’s Who in Introductory Psychology Textbooks: A Citation Analysis Redux. Teaching of Psychology, 43(2), 108–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628316636276

Griggs, R. A., & Proctor, D. L. (2002). A citation analysis of who's who in introductory textbooks. Teaching of Psychology, 29(3), 203-206.

Guidera, J. (2009). Content and Citation Analysis of Interdesciplinary Humanities Textbooks within A Framework of Curriculum Theory.

Hammarfelt, B. (2011). Interdisciplinarity and the intellectual base of literature studies: citation analysis of highly cited monographs. Scientometrics, 86, 705-725. doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0314-5

Hammarfelt, B. (2016). Beyond Coverage: Toward a Bibliometrics for the Humanities Research Assessment in the Humanities (pp. 115-131): Springer International Publishing.

Hicks, D., J. Potter (1991), Sociology of scientific knowledge: A reflexive citation analysis or science disciplines and disciplining science," Social Studies of Science, 21,459-501.

Hicks, D. (1999). The Difficulty of Achieving Full Coverage of International Social Science Literature and the Bibliometric Consequences. Scientometrics, 44(2), 193-215. doi:10.1007/bf02457380

Hoaas, D. J., & Madigan, L. J. (1999). A citation analysis of economists in principles of economics textbooks. The Social Science Journal, 36(3), 525-532.

Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an aternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645-670. DOI: 10.1080/09500690305021

Jaffe, E. D. (1997). International marketing textbooks: a citation analysis as an indicator of the discipline’s boundaries. International Marketing Review, 14(1), 9-19.

Jiang, X., Sun, X., Yang, Z., Zhuge, H., & Yao, J. (2016). Exploiting Heterogeneous Scientific Literature Networks to Combat Ranking Bias: Evidence From the Computational Linguistics Area. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 67(7), 1679-1702. doi:10.1002/asi.23463

Kleinberg, J. M. (1999). Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 46(5), 604-632.

Knapp, T. J. (1985). Who's who in American introductory psychology textbooks: A citation study. Teaching of Psychology, 12(1), 15-17.

Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2008). Assessing the Impact of Disciplinary Research on Teaching: An Automatic Analysis of Online Syllabuses. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(13), 2060-2069. doi:10.1002/asi.20920

Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2009). Google book search: Citation analysis for social science and the humanities. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(8), 1537-1549. doi:10.1002/asi.21085

Kousha, K., Thelwall, M., & Rezaie, S. (2011). Assessing the Citation Impact of Books: The Role of Google Books, Google Scholar, and Scopus. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(11), 2147-2164. doi:10.1002/asi.21608

Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2015). An Automatic Method for Extracting Citations from Google Books. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 66(2), 309-320.

Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2016). An Automatic Method for Assessing the Teaching Impact of Books from Online Academic Syllabi. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(12), 2993-3007. doi:10.1002/asi.23542

Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2017). Are Wikipedia citations important evidence of the impact of scholarly articles and books? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(3), 762-779. doi:10.1002/asi.23694.

Leydesdorff, L. (2009). How are New Citation-Based Journal Indicators Adding to the BibliometricToolbox? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(7), 1327-1336. doi:10.1002/asi.21024

Leydesdorff, L., & Salah, A. A. A. (2010). Maps on the basis of the Arts & Humanities Citation Index: The journals Leonardo and Art Journal, and ‘‘Digital Humanities’’ as a topic. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(4), 787-801.

Lee, H., Song, J. K. M., & Kim, C. O. (2015). Coherence analysis of research and education using topic modeling. Scientometrics, 102, 1119-1137. doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1453-x

Lepionka, M. E. (2005). Writing and Developing Your College Textbook Supplements: Atlantic Path Publishing.

Linmans, A. J. M. (2010). Why with bibliometrics the Humanities does not need to be the weakest link: Indicators for research evaluation based on citations, library holdings, and productivity measures. Scientometrics, 83, 337–354. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0088-9.

Ma, N., Guan, J., & Zhao, Y. (2008). Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis. Information Processing and Management, 44:800-810. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2007.06.006

Martins, W. S., Gonçalves, M. A., Laender, A. H. F., & Ziviani, N. (2010). Assessing the quality of scientific conferences based on bibliographic citations. Scientometrics, 83(1), 133-155. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0078-y.

Nederhof, A. J. (1989). Books and chapters are not to be neglected in measuring research productivity, American Psychologist, 734-735.

Nederhof, A. J., Leeuwen, T. N., & Raan, A. F. J. (2009). Highly cited non-journal publications in political science, economics and psychology: a first exploration. Scientometrics, 83(2), 363-374. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0086-y.

Page, L., Brin, S., Motwani, R., & Winograd, T. (1999). The PageRank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. Stanford InfoLab.

Pinski, G., & Narin, F. (1976). Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory, with application to the literature of physics. Information Processing and Management, 12(5), 297-312.

Radicchi, F., Fortunato, S., Markines, B., & Vespignani, A. (2009). Diffusion of scientific credits and the ranking of scientists. Physical Review E-Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 80(5), 056103.

SENSE (2009). RANKING OF ACADEMIC PUBLISHERS – approved by SENSE General Board in May 2009. Retrieved from http://www.sense.nl/gfx_content/documents/ ABCDEindeling%20Scientific%20Publishers%20SENSE_approved_May_2009.pdf.

Takasuna, M. (2013). Important literature referenced in textbooks on the history of psychology: A preliminary citation analysis using 13 textbooks published after 2001. In: Cheiron.

Vaughan, L., & Shaw, D. (2003). Bibliographic and Web citations: What is the difference? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(14), 1313–1324.

Waltman, L., Yan, E., & Eck, N. J. v. (2011). A recursive field-normalized bibliometric performance indicator: an application to the field of library and information science. Scientometrics, 89, 301-314. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0449-z.

Zhou, D., Orshanskiy, S. A., Zha, H., & Giles, C. L. (2007). Co-ranking authors and documents in a heterogeneous network. Paper presented at the IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM).

Zhuge, H., & Zhang, J. (2010). Topological Centrality and its e-Science Applications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(9), 1824-1841. doi:10.1002/asi.21353.

Zuccala, A., Guns, R., Cornacchia, R., & Bod, R. (2015). Can We Rank Scholarly Book Publishers? A Bibliometric Experiment with the Field of History. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1333-1347. doi:10.1002/asi.23267.