Preferred Robust Response Surface Design with Missing Observations Based on Integrated TOPSIS-AHP Method | ||
| Journal of Quality Engineering and Production Optimization | ||
| مقاله 6، دوره 3، شماره 1، فروردین 2018، صفحه 81-91 اصل مقاله (754.94 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22070/jqepo.2018.1110.1033 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Atefeh Ashuri1؛ Mahdi Bashiri1؛ Amirhossein Amiri* 2 | ||
| 1Industrial Engineering Department, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Industrial Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| - Missing observations occur in experimental designs as a result of insufficient sampling, machine breakdown, high cost, and errors in the measurements. In nanomanufacturing, missing observations often appear in designs because the combination of factors or molecular structures selected by a designer cannot be experimented successfully. In the current paper, Box-Behnken and face-centered composite designs were studied and eight robustness criteria including D-efficiency, tmax, tmax( ), and their related sub-criteria were considered to evaluate the robustness of the aforementioned designs. Finally, the integrated TOPSIS-AHP methodology was employed to select the most suitable robust design, and a numerical example was also presented to assess the applicability of the proposed approach | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Robustness criteria؛ Preferred robust response surface design؛ TOPSIS-AHP methodology؛ Nanomanufacturing | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
K. Lal, V.K. Gupa, & L. Bar, (2001). “Robustness of designed experiments against missing data”,Journal of Applied Statistics, 28, 63-79. N.N. Acharya & H. Black Nembhard, (2009). “Bayesian algorithms for missing observations in experimental designs for a nanolubrication process”, IIE Transactions, 41, 969–978. M. Tanco, E. del Castillo, E. Viles, (2013). “Robustness of three-level response surface designs against missing data”, IIE Transactions, 45, 544-553. P.W.M. John, (1979). “ Missing points in 2n and 2n − k factorial designs”, Technometrics, 21, 225–228. A.M. Herzberg, P. Prescott, & M. Akhtar, (1987). “Equi-information robust designs: which designs are possible? ”, Candian Journal of Statistics, 15, 71–76. A. Dey, (1993). “Robustness of block designs against missing data”. Statistica Sinica, 3, 219–231. M.J. Anderson, & P.J. Whitcomb, (2007). “Using graphical diagnostics to deal with bad data”, Quality Engineering, 19, 111–118. S. Ghosh, (1979). “On robustness of designs against incomplete data”. Sankhya, Series B, 40, 204–208. S.N., MacEachern, W., Notz, D.C., Whittinghill, & Y. Zhu, (1995). “ Robustness to the unavailability of data in the linear model with applications”, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 48, 207–213. D.C. Whittinghill, (1998). “A note on the robustness of Box–Behnken designs to the unavailability of data”. Metrika, 48, 49–52. Ahmad, T., Akhtar, M. & Gilmour, S.G, (2012). “Multilevel augmented pairs second-order response surface designs and their robustness to missing data”. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 41,437-452. Ahmad, T. & Akhtar, M, (2015). “Efficient response surface designs for the second-order multivariate polynomial model robust to missing observation”. Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice, 9,361-375. Yakubu, Y., Chukwu, A.U., Adebayo, B.T. & Nwanzo, A.G, (2014). “ Effects of missing observations on predictive capability of central composite designs”. International Journal on Computational Sciences & Applications, 4, 1-18. P. Sen & J-B. Yang, (1998). “Multiple Criteria Decision Support in Engineering Design”. London, Great Britain: Springer-Verlag London Limited. TL. Satty, (1988). “Multi Criteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process”, New York: Mc Graw-Hill Inc. P Chatterjee, VM. Athawale, S Chakraborty, (2010). “Selection of industrial robots using compromise ranking and outranking methods”, Robotics and Computer- Integrated Manufacturing, 26, 483–489. Y. Kuo , T. Yang and G.W. Huang, (2008). “The use of grey relational analysis in solving multiple attribute decision-making problems. Computers & Industrial Engineering”, 55, 80–93. [TL. Saaty, (1980). “The analytic hierarchy process”, New York: McGraw-Hill. R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam & S.M. Mousavi, (2011). “An integrated AHP-VIKOR methodology for plant location selection”, International Journal of Engineering, 24, 127-137. RV. Rao & JP.Davim, (2008). “Decision-making framework models for material selection using a combined multiple attribute decision-making method”. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 35,751–60. D.C. Montgomery, (2005). “ Design and Analysis of Experiments”, sixth edition,Wiley, New York, NY. R.H. Myers & D.C. Montgomery, “Response Surface Methodology”, second edition, Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY. S. Ghosh, (1982). “Robustness of designs against the unavailability of data”, Sankhya, Series B, 444, 50–62. J. Malczewski, (1999). “GIS and Multicriteria Desision Analysis”, New York: John Willey and Sons, Inc. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 337 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 414 |
||