https://www.sid.ir/paper/224334/fa

    https://doi.org/10.35050/JIPM010.2013.011

    https://www.aimj.ir/article_50815.html

    https://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/article_699570.html?lang=fa

    https://doi.org/10.35050/JIPM010.2015.040

    https://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/article_699445.html

     https://doi.org/10. https://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/article_699476.html

Abramo, G., D'Angelo, C. A., Grilli, L. (2021). The effects of citation-based research evaluation schemes on self-citation behavior. Journal of Informetrics, 15(4), 101204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2021.101204

Ahmadi, H., & Osareh, F. (2017). Co-word analysis Concept, Definition and Application. Librarianship and Information Organization Studies (Journal of National Studies on Librarianship and Information Organization), 28(1), 125-145.

      https://nastinfo.nlai.ir/article_1132.html [In Persian].

Ebrahim, N., Salehi, H., Embi, M., Tanha, F., Gholizadeh, H., & Motahar, S. (2014). Visibility and citation impact. International Education Studies, 7(4), 120-125.

      https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n4p120

Alipour-Hafezi, M., Ramezani, H., & Momeni, E. (2018). Knowledge map of digital libraries in Iran: a co-word analysis. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 33(2), 453-488. https://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/article_699445.html?lang=en

      [In Persian].

Alkadi, L., Haq, I. U., Allhaidan, W., Almusa, J., & Alshammari, A. (2024). Gender Variation, subject dispersion and citation impact in dental research: A bibliometric analysis of publications from 2009–2021. The Saudi Dental Journal, 36(1), 112-116.

      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.10.007

Andersen, J. P., Schneider, J. W., Jagsi, R., & Nielsen, M. W. (2019). Meta-research: Gender variations in citation distributions in medicine are very small and due to self-citation and journal prestige. eLife, 8, e45374. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45374

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. D. (2008). What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of documentation, 64(1), 45-80.

      https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410810844150

Brusco, M., Steinley, D., & Watts, A. L. (2024). A comparison of spectral clustering and the walktrap algorithm for community detection in network psychometrics. Psychological Methods, 29(4), 704-722. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000509

Callon, M., Law, J., & Rip, A. (Eds.) (1986). Mapping the dynamics of science and technology: Sociology of science in the real world. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07408-2

Chatterjee, P., & Werner, R. M. (2021). Gender disparity in citations in high-impact journal articles. JAMA Network Open, 4(7), e2114509-e2114509.

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/articlepdf/2781617/chatterjee_2021_oi_210439_1629473414.38917.pdf

Cislak, A., Formanowicz, M., & Saguy, T. (2018). Bias against research on gender bias. Scientometrics, 115(1), 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2667-0

Clarivate Analytics (2024). Web of Science Core Collection: Search Tips. Retrieved June 2024. https://ufh.za.libguides.com/c.php?g=979339&p=7081735

Ding, Y., Zhang, G., Chambers, T., Song, M., Wang, X., & Zhai, C. (2014). Content‐based citation analysis: The next generation of citation analysis. Journal of the association for information science and technology, 65(9), 1820-1833. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23256

Dion, M. L., Sumner, J. L., & Mitchell, S. M. (2018). Gendered citation patterns across political science and social science methodology fields. Political Analysis, 26(3), 312–327.

      https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2018.12

Duyx, B., Urlings, M. J. E., Swaen, G. M. H., Bouter, L. M., & Zeegers, M. P. (2017). Scientific citations favor positive results: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 88, 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.002

Dworkin, J. D., Linn, K. A., Teich, E. G., Zurn, P., Shinohara, R. T., & Bassett, D. S. (2020). The extent and drivers of gender imbalance in neuroscience reference lists. Nature Neuroscience, 23(8), 918–926. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-0658-y

Fister Jr, I., Fister, I., & Perc, M. (2016). Toward the discovery of citation cartels in citation networks. Frontiers in Physics, 4(49), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2016.00049

Fulvio, J. M., Akinnola, I., & Postle, B. R. (2021). Gender (im)balance in citation practices in cognitive neuroscience. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 33(1), 3–7.

      https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01643

Gøtzsche, P.C. (2022). Citation bias: questionable research practice or scientific misconduct? Jou nal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 115(1), 31-35.

      https://doi.org/10.1177/01410768221075881

Greenacre, M., & Blasius, J. (2006). Multiple correspondence analysis and related methods. Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420011319

Haidari, G., Zavaraqi, R., Mokhtarpour, R., & Khasseh, A. A. (2018). Intellectual structure of library and information science from the perspective of. Librarianship and Information Organization Studies, 29(3), 39-60. https://www.sid.ir/paper/224334/en [In Persian].

Hosseini, E., Ghaebi, A., & Baradar, R. (2021). Bibliometrics and Mapping of Co-words in the Field of Linked Data. Scientometrics Research Journal, 7(1), 91-116.

      https://doi.org/10.22070/rsci.2020.4904.1333 [In Persian].

Hu, C. P., Hu, J. M., Deng, S. L., & Liu, Y. (2013). A co-word analysis of library and information science in China. Scientometrics, 97(2), 369-382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1076-7

Jannot, A. S., Agoritsas, T., Gayet-Ageron, A., & Perneger, T. V. (2013). Citation bias favoring statistically significant studies was present in medical research. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 66(3), 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.015

Joshi, P. B., & Pandey, M. (2024). Deception Through Manipulated Citations and References as a Growing Problem in Scientific Publishing. In Scientific Publishing Ecosystem: An Author-Editor-Reviewer Axis (pp. 285-306). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.  

      https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-4060-4_17

Khalilijafarabad, A. (2018). Analyzing the Evolution of Data Quality Research Area Using Co-Word Analysis. Iranian Journal of Information Management, 3(2), 121-138.

      https://www.aimj.ir/article_69410.html?lang=en [In Persian].

Khasseh, A. A., Soheili, F., Sharif Moghaddam, H., & Chelak, A. M. (2017). Intellectual structure of knowledge in iMetrics: A co-word analysis. Information Processing & Management, 53(3), 705-720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2017.02.001

Khorami Markaney, A., Yagmayee, F., & Habibzadeh, H. (2010). Research error in medical sciences studies and their control strategies. Nursing and Midwifery Journal, 8(3), 175-182. http://unmf.umsu.ac.ir/article-1-217-fa.html [In Persian].

King, J. (1987). A review of bibliometric and other science indicators and their role in research evaluation.  Journal of information science, 13(5), 261-276.

      https://doi.org/10.1177/016555158701300501

Kivimäki, M., Batty, G. D., Kawachi, I., Virtanen, M., Singh-Manoux, A., & Brunner, E. J. (2014). Don't let the truth get in the way of a good story: an illustration of citation bias in epidemiologic research. American. journal of epidemiology, 180(4), 446–448.

      https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwu164

Larivière, V., Archambault, É., Gingras, Y., & Vignola-Gagné, É. (2006). The place of serials in referencing practices: Comparing natural sciences and engineering with social sciences and humanities. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(8), 997–1004. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20349

Larivière, V., Ni, C., Gingras, Y., Cronin, B., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013). Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science. Nature, 504(7479), 211–213. https://doi.org/10.1038/504211a

Lee, W. H. (2008). How to identify emerging research fields using scientometrics: An example in the field of Information Security. Scientometrics, 76(3), 503–525.

      https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1898-2

Liu, F., Rahwan, T., & AlShebli, B. (2023). Non-White scientists appear on fewer editorial boards, spend more time under review, and receive fewer citations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(13), e2215324120.

      https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2215324120

Llorens, A., Tzovara, A., Bellier, L., Bhaya-Grossman, I., Bidet-Caulet, A., Chang, W. K., ... & Dronkers, N. F. (2021). Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions. Neuron, 109(13), 2047–2074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2021.06.002

Lyu, H., Bu, Y., Zhao, Z., Zhang, J., & Li, J. (2022). Citation bias in measuring knowledge flow: Evidence from the Web of Science at the discipline level. Journal of Informetrics, 16(4), 101338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2022.101338

Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science, 159(3810), 56–63.

      https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56

Mirnezami, S. R., Beaudry, C., & Larivière, V. (2016). What determines researchers’ scientific impact? A case study of Quebec researchers. Science & Public Policy, 43(2), 262–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scv038

Moed, H. F. (2010). Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals. Journal of Informetrics, 4(3), 265-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.01.002

Mohammadi, E., & Thelwall, M. (2014). Mendeley readership altmetrics for the social sciences and humanities: Research evaluation and knowledge flows. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(8), 1627–1638. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23071

Mohammadi, M., Shirani, F., & Sadeghi, M. (2018). Bias in the Clinical Trials: A Review Article. Nursing and Midwifery Journal, 16(4), 273-285.

      https://unmf.umsu.ac.ir/article-1-3380-fa.html  [In Persian].

Mott, C., & Cockayne, D. (2017). Citation matters: Mobilizing the politics of citation toward a practice of ‘conscientious engagement.’ Gender, Place, & Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 24(7), 954–973. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2017.1339022

Mostafavi, I., Osareh, F., & Tavakolizadeh-Ravari, M. (2018). Identifying Content Structure of Knowledge and Information Science (KIS) a Studies Based on Co-word Analysis of Articles in a Web of Science (WoS) a Database (2009-2013). Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 33(3), 1271-1300.

      https://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/article_699476.html?lang=en [In Persian].

Nash, J. C. (2020). Citational desires: On Black feminism’s institutional longings. Diacritics, 48(3), 76–91. https://doi.org/10.1353/dia.2020.0020

Noyons, E. C., & Van Raan, A. F. (1998). Monitoring scientific developments from a dynamic perspective: Self-organized structuring to map neural network research. Journal of the American society for information science, 49(1), 68-81. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1998)49:1%3C68::AID-ASI9%3E3.0.CO;2-1

Osareh, F., Soheili, F., & Mansouri, A. (2014). Scientometrics and information visualization. Isfahan University Press. https://press.ui.ac.ir/book_300.html [In Persian].

Paris, G., De Leo, G., Menozzi, P., & Gatto, M. (1998). Region-based citation bias in science. Nature, 396(6708), 210. https://doi.org/10.1038/24249

Popovic, A., & Huecker, M. R. (2023). Study Bias. In StatPearls.

      https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34662027/

Ray, K. S., Zurn, P., Dworkin, J. D., Bassett, D. S., & Resnik, D. B. (2024). Citation bias, diversity, and ethics. Accountability in Research, 31(2), 158–172.

      https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2022.2111257

Riehmann, P., Hanfler, M., & Froehlich, B. (2005, October). Interactive sankey diagrams. In IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 2005. INFOVIS 2005. (pp. 233-240). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/INFVIS.2005.1532152

Rossen, K., & Miller, K. A. (2021). Citation bias in organic chemistry research: Are industry-affiliated papers cited less often? Organic Process Research & amp, Development, 25(2), 167–168. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.1c00023

Salemi, N., & Koosha, K. (2014). Co-citation Analysis and Co-word Analysis in Bibliometrics Mapping: A Methodological Evaluation. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 29(1), 253-266. https://doi.org/10.35050/JIPM010.2013.011 [In Persian].

Secchi, D. (2023). A Simple Model of Citation Cartels: When Self-interest Strikes Science. In Advances in Social Simulation: Proceedings of the 17th Social Simulation Conference, European Social Simulation Association (pp. 23-32). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34920-1_3

Sedighi, M. (2015). Using of co-word analysis method in mapping of the structure of scientific fields (case study: The field of Informetrics). Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 30(2), 373-396. https://doi.org/10.35050/JIPM010.2015.040 [In Persian].

Simundić A. M. (2013). Bias in research. Biochem Med (Zagreb), 23(1), 12–15.

      https://doi.org/10.11613/bm.2013.003

Soheili, F., Shaban, A., & Khaseh, A. (2016). Intellectual structure of knowledge in information behavior: A co-word analysis. Human Information Interaction, 2(4), 21-36.

      https://hii.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2446-fa.html [In Persian].

Soheili, F., Khasseh, A. A., & Koranian, P. (2019). Mapping Intellectual Structure of Knowledge and Information Science in Iran based on Co-word Analysis. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 34(4), 1905-1938.

      https://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/article_699570.html?lang=en [In Persian].

Soltani Zarandi, Z., Negahban, M. B., & Makkizadeh, F. (2016). Co-word analysis of articles in related to Kerman Agriculture in the Islamic World Science Citation (ISCI) according to an approach of scientific map. Iranian Journal of Information Management, 2(3), 74-96.

      https://www.aimj.ir/article_50815.html?lang=en [In Persian].

Squazzoni, F., Bravo, G., Farjam, M., Marusic, A., Mehmani, B., Willis, M., Birukou, A., Dondio, P., & Grimaldo, F. (2021). Peer review and gender bias: A study on 145 scholarly journals. Science advances, 7(2), eabd0299. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd0299

Stelmakh, I., Rastogi, C., Liu, R., Chawla, S., Echenique, F., & Shah, N. B. (2023). Cite-seeing and reviewing: A study on citation bias in peer review. PLOS ONE, 18(7), e0283980. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283980

Suzuki, E., Tsuda, T., Mitsuhashi, T., Mansournia, M. A., & Yamamoto, E. (2016). Errors in causal inference: an organizational schema for systematic error and random error. Annals of Epidemiology, 26(11), 788-793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.09.008

Urlings, M. J. E., Duyx, B., Swaen, G. M. H., Bouter, L. M., & Zeegers, M. P. (2021). Citation bias and other determinants of citation in biomedical research: findings from six citation networks. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 132, 71-78.

      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.11.019

Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2018). VOSviewer manual. Erişim adresi:

      http://www.vosviewer.com/download/f-z2w2.Pdf.

Vassar, M., Johnson, A. L., Sharp, A., & Wayant, C. (2021). Citation bias in otolaryngology systematic reviews. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 109(1), 62–68.

      https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2021.736

Waltman, L. (2016). A review of the literature on citation impact indicators. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 365-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007

Way, S. F., Morgan, A. C., Larremore, D. B., & Clauset, A. (2019). Productivity, prominence, and the effects of academic environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 116(22), 10729–10733. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1817431116

Whittaker, J. (1989). Creativity and Conformity in Science: Titles, Keywords and Co-word Analysis. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 473-496.

      https://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003004

Wu, C. (2023). The gender citation gap: Why and how it matters. Canadian review of sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie, 60(2), 188–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/cars.12428

Xie, H., Zhang, Y., Wu, Z., & Lv, T. (2020). A bibliometric analysis on land degradation: Current status, development, and future directions. Land, 9(1), 28.

      https://doi.org/10.3390/land9010028

Zangeneh Nejad, N., Hajiheydari, N., & Salehi, M. (2018). Network Analysis of Relations between Information System Theories and Researches. Iranian Journal of Information Management, 3(2), 27-50. https://www.aimj.ir/article_68829.html [In Persian].

Zaidi, S. J. A., & Taqi, M. (2023). Citation cartels in medical and dental journals. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak, 33(12), 700–701.