https://samt.ac.ir/fa/book/39

    https://rahyaft.nrisp.ac.ir/article_13512.html

    https://www.magiran.com/p1299692

    https://lis.aqr-libjournal.ir/article_43932.html

    https://ganj.irandoc.ac.ir/#/articles/2e1851e31167a33f28f6ee941086d8c9

    https://doi.org/10.30481/lis.2020.199112.1617

    https://www.sid.ir/paper/211733/fa

    http://publij.ir/article-1-91-fa.html

    https://doi.org/10.22047/hsd.2022.182458

    https://sspp.iranjournals.ir/article_30761.html

    https://rahyaft.nrisp.ac.ir/article_13633.html

    https://samt.ac.ir/fa/book/99/B

    https://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/article_699432.html?lang=fa

Abasi, F., Aslaninia, V., & Biglu, M. H. (2014). A study of scientific production in the field of social psychology in Web of Science (1990-2009): Mapping the historical Structure. Journal of Knowledge Studies, 7(24), 99-112. https://qje.ntb.iau.ir/article_517024.html?lang=en [In Persian].

Abramo, G., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2015). Ranking research institutions by the number of highly-cited articles per scientist. Journal of Informetrics, 9(4), 915-923.

      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.09.001

Archambault, É., Vignola-Gagné, É., Côté, G., Lariviere, V., & Gingrasb, Y. (2006). Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases. Scientometrics, 68(3), 329-342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0115-z

Bazargan, A., & Farasatkhah, M. (2017). Monitoring and evaluation in higher education. Tehran: SAMT. https://samt.ac.ir/en/book/2891/monitoring-and-evaluation-in-higher-education [In Persian].

Benneworth, P. (2015). Tracing how arts and humanities research translates, circulates, and consolidates in society. How have scholars been reacting to diverse impact and public value agendas? Arts humanities in higher education, 14(1), 45-60.

      https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022214533888

Bornmann, L. (2013). What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? A literature survey. Journal of the American Society for information science technology, 64(2), 217-233.  https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22803

Borovik, M. A., & Shemberko, L. V. (2016). The challenges of information retrieval in social sciences and humanities and ways to overcome information barriers. Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 43, 99-105. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688216020039

Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Miguel, S., & de Moya-Anegón, F. (2014). What factors affect the visibility of Argentinean publications in humanities and social sciences in Scopus? Some evidence beyond the geographic realm of research. Scientometrics, 102(1), 789-810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1414-4

Cicero, T., & Malgarini, M. (2020). On the use of journal classification in social sciences and humanities: evidence from an Italian database. Scientometrics, 125(2), 1689-1708.

      https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03581-8

Coryn, C. L. S. (2007). Evaluation of researchers and their research: Toward making the implicit explicit. Western Michigan University.

      https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations/3401/

Davarpanah, M. R. (2007). Scientometric Challenges in Humanities and Social Sciences:  A Comparison with other Scientific Areas. Research in Clinical Psychology and Counseling, 8(2), 125-146. https://doi.org/10.22067/ijap.v8i2.6799 [In Persian].

Dayyani, M. H., & Shirdel, S. (2007). Reviewing and comparing Persian abstracts of scientific research journals in the field of humanities with ISO 214 standard. Library and Information Sciences, 10(2), 37-52.  https://lis.aqr-libjournal.ir/article_43932.html?lang=en

      [In Persian].

Diaz-Faes, A. A., Bordons, M., & Van Leeuwen, T. N. (2016). Integrating metrics to measure research performance in social sciences and humanities: The case of the Spanish CSIC. Research Evaluation, (p. rvw018). Oxford University Press (OUP).

      https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvw018

Docampo, D. (2011). On using the Shanghai ranking to assess the research performance of university systems. Scientometrics, 86(1), 77-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0280-y

Doğan, G., & Taşkın, Z. (2020). Humanities: The Outlier of Research Assessments. Information, 11(11), 540. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11110540

D’Souza, R. (2021). What characterises creativity in narrative writing, and how do we assess it? Research findings from a systematic literature search. Thinking skills, 42, p 100949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100949

Ebrahimi Dorcheh, E., Mansouri, A., Pashootanizadeh, M., MirbagheriFard, A. A., & Shabani, A. (2024). Harms and Strategies for Evaluating Humanities Research Outputs: A Case Study of Language and Literature. Scientometrics Research Journal, 9(2), 75-96.   https://doi.org/10.22070/RSCI.2022.16133.1583 [In Persian].

Ebrahimi Dorcheh, E., Mansouri, A., Pashootanizadeh, M., Mirbagheri fard, A. A., & Shabani, A. (2023). Evaluation policies and criteria of humanities scientific outputs from experts' point of view: a case study of language and literature fields. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 39(1), 63-100. https://doi.org/10.22034/jipm.2023.705519
[In Persian].

Fadaie, G., & Hassanzadeh Kamand, H. (2010). Evaluation of Scientific Publications of Faculty Members of Human Sciences Department in Tabriz University during 2002-2007. Research on Information Science and Public Libraries, 16(2), 157-175. http://publij.ir/article-1-91-fa.html [In Persian].

Farasatkhah, M. (2021). Under the Skin of Iranian Humanities Duel of Actors and Structures. Journal of Human Sciences Development, 2(4), 5-18.

      https://doi.org/10.22047/hsd.2022.182458 [In Persian].

Ferrara, A., & Bonaccorsi, A. (2016). How robust is journal rating in Humanities and Social Sciences? Evidence from a large-scale, multi-method exercise. Research Evaluation, 25(3), 279-291. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv048

Ghanadinezhad, F., & Heidari, G. (2020). Methods and Indicators for the Evaluation of Scientific Production in the Humanities and Social Sciences: A Systematic Review. Scientometrics Research Journal, 6(2), 203-230. https://doi.org/10.22070/rsci.2020.4998.1341

      [In Persian].

Ghazinoory, S., & Farazkish, M. (2018). A modal for STI national evaluation based efficiency, effectiveness and Utility index. Strategic Studies of public policy, 8(27), 205-229. https://sspp.iranjournals.ir/article_30761.html?lang=en [In Persian].

Giménez-Toledo, E., Mañana-Rodríguez, J., & Sivertsen, G. (2017). Scholarly book publishing: Its information sources for evaluation in the social sciences and humanities. Research Evaluation, 26(2), 91-101. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvx007

Glänzel, W., Thijs, B., & Chi, P.-S. (2016). The challenges to expand bibliometric studies from periodical literature to monographic literature with a new data source: The book citation index. Scientometrics, 109(3), 2165-2179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2046-7

Gumpenberger, C., Sorz, J., Wieland, M., & Gorraiz, J. (2016). Humanities and social sciences in the bibliometric spotlight–Research output analysis at the University of Vienna and considerations for increasing visibility. Research Evaluation, 25(3), 271-278.

      https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvw013

Haddow, G., & Hammarfelt, B. (2019). Quality, impact, and quantification: Indicators and metrics use by social scientists. Journal of the Association for Information Science Technology, 70(1), 16-26. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24097

Hamdipour, A., Zavaraqi, R., & Sabatehagh, A. (2022). Publication Patterns Analysis of the Humanities and Social Sciences in The Top 50 Countries in Comparison with the Total Publications of These Countries on the Web of Science Database. Scientometrics Research Journal, 8(1), 97-122. https://doi.org/10.22070/rsci.2020.5750.1422 [In Persian].

Hariri, N., & Teimourkhani, A. (2014). Traditional and Web Citations in Humanities Open Access Journals: A Comparison. Librarianship and Information Organization Studies, 25(1), 124-139. https://www.magiran.com/p1299692 [In Persian].

Hassanzadeh, M., Esbaktabar, M., Sohrabzadeh, S., & Mohammadi Zeron, N. (2019). Impact of Co-authorship on the Quality of Papers: An Approach to Papers Published in the Field of Knowledge and Information Science from 2008 to 2015. Scientometrics Research Journal, 5(2), 177-198. https://doi.org/10.22070/rsci.2017.565 [In Persian].

Hilário, C. M., & Grácio, M. C. C. (2017). Scientific collaboration in Brazilian researches: a comparative study in the information science, mathematics and dentistry fields. Scientometrics, 113(2), 929-950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2498-4

Hug, S. E., Ochsner, M., & Daniel, H.-D. (2013). Criteria for assessing research quality in the humanities: a Delphi study among scholars of English literature, German literature and art history. Research Evaluation, 22(5), 369-383. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvt008

Jafari, F., & Fahimnia, F. (2010). A Survey on Characteristics of Core Latin Journals in Scientific Output of Faculty Members of Tehran University in Accordance to ISI Citations and JCR Impact Factor During 1990-2009. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 26(1), 69-87. https://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/article_699040.html?lang=en

      [In Persian].

Jafari, F., & Goltaji, M. (2012). The Study of Scientific Outputs Status of Faculty Members of Humanities, Art and Social Sciences Faculties of State Universities of Iran during 2000-2008. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 27(3), 561-575. https://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/article_699156.html?lang=en [In Persian].

Jamali Mahmuee, H. (2011). Research Evaluation: Approaches, Techniques and Challenges. Rahyaft, 21(49), 39-52.  https://rahyaft.nrisp.ac.ir/article_13512.html [In Persian].

Janinovic, J., Pekovic, S., Vuckovic, D., Djokovic, R., & Peic, M. (2020). Innovative strategies for creating and assessing research quality and societal impact in social sciences and humanities. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems: INDECS, 18(4), 449-458.

      https://doi.org/10.7906/indecs.18.4.5

Karakaya, E., & Nuur, C. (2018). Social sciences and the mining sector: Some insights into recent research trends. Resources Policy, 58, 257-267.

      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.05.014

Khosravi, M., & Pournaghi, R. (2019). Dimensions of Research Impact: A Systematic Review. Scientometrics Research Journal, 5(1), 203-224. https://doi.org/10.22070/rsci.2018.695
[In Persian].

Krull, W., & Tepperwien, A. (2016). The four ‘I’s: Quality indicators for the humanities. In Research Assessment in the Humanities (pp. 165-179). Springer, Cham. https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/22952/1007208.pdf?sequence=1#page=171

Ku, M.-C. (2019). A comparative analysis of English abstracts and summaries of Chinese research articles in three library and information science journals indexed by the Taiwan Social Science Citation Index. Journal of Library and information studies, 17(1), 37-81. https://doi.org/10.6182/jlis.201906_17(1).037

Kulczycki, E., & Rozkosz, E. A. (2017). Does an expert-based evaluation allow us to go beyond the Impact Factor? Experiences from building a ranking of national journals in Poland. Scientometrics, 111(1), 417-442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2261-x

Leydesdorff, L., & Rafols, I. (2009). A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories. Journal of the American Society for information science technology, 60(2), 348-362. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20967

Link, A. N. (1995). The use of literature-based innovation output indicators for research evaluation. Small Business Economics, 7(6), 451–455. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40228776

Liu, W., Hu, G., Tang, L., & Wang, Y. (2015). China's global growth in social science research: Uncovering evidence from bibliometric analyses of SSCI publications (1978–2013). Journal of Informetrics, 9(3), 555-569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.05.007

Milzow, K., Reinhardt, A., Söderberg, S., & Zinöcker, K. (2018). Understanding the use and usability of research evaluation studies. Research Evaluation, 28(1), 94-107. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvy040

Mirzaei, E., Ghaebi, A., & Kamran, M. (2013). Criterions of Evaluating Scientific Publications Nationally and Internationally: Viewpoints of Editors and administrators of Persian Scientific Publications Published in the Field of Humanities. Librarianship and Information Organization Studies, 24(2), 138-158. https://nastinfo.nlai.ir/article_75.html?lang=en

      [In Persian].

Moradi, S., & Janavi, E. (2017). The Scholarly Communication of Iranian Science and Culture Hall of Fame in Humanities & Engineering: A Study of Late and Early Citation. Rahyaft, 27(68), 13-24. https://rahyaft.nrisp.ac.ir/article_13633.html?lang=en [In Persian].

Nederhof, A. J. (2011). A bibliometric study of productivity and impact of modern language and literature research. Research Evaluation, 20(2), 117-129.

      https://doi.org/10.3152/095820211X12941371876508

Noroozi Chakoli, A. (2011). Introduction to Scientometrics (foundations, concepts, relations and origins). SAMT. https://samt.ac.ir/en/book/3376/introduction-to-scientometric

      [In Persian].

Noroozi Chakoli, A., Ghazavi, R., & Taheri, B. (2016). Valuation of Research Evaluation Indicators in Different Scientific Fields in Iran. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 8(4), 31-40. https://jstp.nrisp.ac.ir/article_12941.html?lang=en [In Persian].

Ochsner, M., & Hug, S. E. (2016). Indicators for research performance in the humanities? The scholars’ view on research quality and indicators [Conference presentation]. Paper presented at the 21st International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators: STI Conference 2016 València: Peripheries, frontiers and beyond: book of proceedings.

      https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-010735875

Ochsner, M., Hug, S. E., & Daniel, H.-D. (2014). Setting the stage for the assessment of research quality in the humanities. Consolidating the results of four empirical studies. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaften, 17(6), 111-132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-014-0576-4

Osareh, F., & bajji, F. (2009). Scientific Productions Of Iranian Effective Authors In The Field Of Social Sciences In Web Of Science Database In The Period 1990-2006. Journal of Studies in Library and Information Science, 1-16(2), 5-28. https://www.sid.ir/paper/211733/en [In Persian].

Pajić, D. (2014). Globalization of the social sciences in Eastern Europe: Genuine breakthrough or a slippery slope of the research evaluation practice? Scientometrics, 102(3), 2131-2150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1510-5

Piryani, R., Gupta, V., Singh, V. K., & Pinto, D. (2018). Book impact assessment: A quantitative and text-based exploratory analysis. Journal of Intelligent, 34(5), 3101-3110.

      https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-169494

Rashad, A. A. (2016). Science classification logic. Zehn. 17(1), 5-28.

      https://zehn.iict.ac.ir/article_22965.html [In Persian].

Refahi Komsari, A., Asnafi, A. R., & Haji Zeinlobaedini, M. (2022). Criteria for Evaluating and Ranking the Content of Specialized Books in the Field of Humanities according to Specialists' Viewpoint. Library and Information Sciences, 25(3), 143-165.

      https://doi.org/10.30481/lis.2020.199112.1617 [In Persian].

Ren, Q., & Gong, X. (2012). Evaluation index system for academic papers of humanities and social sciences. Scientometrics, 93(3), 1047-1060. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0790-x

Rezaei, A. M. (2010). Examining performance evaluation indicators of humanities departments and faculties to develop a structural model [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Allameh Tabataba'i University. Visited at:

      https://ganj.irandoc.ac.ir/#/articles/2e1851e31167a33f28f6ee941086d8c9 [In Persian].

Robinson-Garcia, N., Costas, R., Nane, G. F., & van Leeuwen, T. N. (2023). Valuation regimes in academia: Researchers’ attitudes towards their diversity of activities and academic performance. Research Evaluation, 32(2) 495-514. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvac049

Rovira-Esteva, S., & Orero, P. (2012). Evaluating quality and excellence in translation studies research. Babel, 58(3), 264-288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/babel.58.3.02rov

Saki, R. (2006). Systemic thinking; Prerequisite for the development of research in the field of humanities. National Humanities Congress. Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies. https://civilica.com/doc/100697/ [In Persian].

Sani’ee, N., Nemati-Anaraki, L., Sedghi, S., Noroozi Chakoli, A., & Goharinezhad, S. (2022). The Effective Trends and Driving Forces in The Future of Research Performance Evaluation: A Qualitative Study. Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 36(1).

      https://doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.36.55

Schwekendiek, D. J. (2020). Trends in Korean studies: A content analysis of Korea-related articles published in the Arts & Humanities Citation Index, 1990–2015. International Area Studies Review, 23(4), 325-334. https://doi.org/10.1177/2233865920934954

Sīle, L., & Vanderstraeten, R. (2019). Measuring changes in publication patterns in a context of performance-based research funding systems: the case of educational research in the University of Gothenburg (2005–2014). Scientometrics, 118(1), 71-91.

      https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2963-8

Sīle, L., Pölönen, J., Sivertsen, G., Guns, R., Engels, T. C. E., Arefiev, P., Dušková, M., Faurbæk, L., Holl, A., Kulczycki, E., Macan, B., Nelhans, G., Petr, M., Pisk, M., Soós, S., Stojanovski, J., Stone, A., Šušol, J., & Teitelbaum, R. (2018).Comprehensiveness of national bibliographic databases for social sciences and humanities: Findings from a European survey. Research Evaluation, 27(4), 310-322. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvy016

Smit, J. P., & Hessels, L. K. (2021). The production of scientific and societal value in research evaluation: A review of societal impact assessment methods. Research Evaluation, 30(3), 323–335. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvab002

Spaapen, J., & Van Drooge, L. (2011). Introducing productive interactions in social impact assessment. Research Evaluation, 20(3), 211-218.

      https://doi.org/10.3152/095820211X12941371876742

Su, F., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Research output, intellectual structures and contributors of digital humanities research: a longitudinal analysis 2005–2020. Journal of Documentation, 78(3), 673-695. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-11-2020-0199

Tavkolizadehravary, M., Hazeri, A., Nagafi, R., & Soheili, F. (2016). A study of one decade of scientific contribution by Iranian researchers to Persian journals. Scientometrics Research Journal, 2(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.22070/rsci.2016.488 [In Persian].

Tayefehbagher, D., Abazari, Z., Moradi, S., & Babalhavaeji, F. (2022). A Model for Evaluating the Impact of Humanities Research in Iran. Scientometrics Research Journal, 8(1), 1-34.  https://doi.org/10.22070/rsci.2020.13384.1450 [In Persian].

Torres-Salinas, D., Bordons, M., Giménez-Toledo, E., Delgado-López-Cózar, E., Jiménez-Contreras, E., & Sanz-Casado, E. (2010). Clasificación integrada de revistas científicas (CIRC): propuesta de categorización de las revistas en ciencias sociales y humanas. El Profesional de la Informacion, 19(6), 675-684. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2010.nov.15

Vahdatzad, M. A., Zare BanadKooki, M., Owlia, M. S., & Lotfi, M. M. (2017). The Analysis of Iranian Universities Ranking Using the Scientometric Indicators. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 33(1), 117-160.

      https://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/article_699432.html?lang=en [In Persian].

Yang, S., Zheng, M., Yu, Y., & Wolfram, D. (2021). Are Altmetric.com scores effective for research impact evaluation in the social sciences and humanities? Journal of Informetrics, 15(1), p 101120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2020.101120

Zandi Ravan, N., Davarpanah, M. R., & Fattahi, R. (2017). Science Production Mapping in Iran, based on the Articles Indexed in Science for Scientific Information (SCI-E). Library and Information Science Research, 7(1), 5-26. https://doi.org/10.22067/riis.v7i1.39601