https://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/article_699091.html?lang=fa

    https://www.atf.gov.ir/Content/media/filepool3/2020/10/266.pdf?t=637379369862605000

    https://doi.org/10.22055/slis.2015.11319

    https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/law/show/838896

    https://ce.mazums.ac.ir/article-1-498-fa.html

    http://lib.shahed.ac.ir/web/guest/independent

    https://doi.org/10.35050/JIPM010.2015.049

    https://civilica.com/doc/134766

Abdollahi, H. (2013). Challenges of measuring the educational efficiency of university faculty members. Educational Measurement Quarterly, 2(7), 139-170.

      https://jem.atu.ac.ir/article_5628.html [In Persian].

Academic authorship (2017). In Wikipedia.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academic authorship. (Accessed November 3, 2021).

Akakandelwa, A. (2009). Author collaboration and productivity at the University of Zambia, 2002-2007. African Journal of Library, Archive & Information Science, 19(1),13-23. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajlais/article/view/42873

Alibeygi, A. (2008). An Analysis of the Research Productivity of Faculty Members: The Case of Razi University. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 13(4), 125-154. https://journal.irphe.ac.ir/article_702608.html [In Persian].

Banks, M. G. (2006). An extension of the Hirsch index: Indexing scientific topics and compounds. Scientometrics, 69(1), 161–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0146-5

Bashkoh, A., Ekrami, M., Soheili, F., & Karimi, A. (2020). Study of the Effects of Co-Authorship Strategies on Scientific Productivity of Researchers in Distance Education: Application of social network analysis method and social capital paradigm. Scientometrics Research Journal, 6(2), 79-102. https://doi.org/10.22070/rsci.2019.4471.1294 [In Persian].

Batista, P. D., Campiteli, M. G., & Kinouchi, O. (2006). Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests?, Scientometrics, 68(1), 179-89.

      https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0090-4

Bazeley, P. (2010). Conceptualising research performance. Studies in Higher Education, 35(8), 889-903. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903348404

Besancenot, D., Huynh, K., & Serranito, F. (2017).  Co-authorship and research productivity in economics: Assessing the assortative matching hypothesis. Journal of Economic Modelling, 66, 61-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2017.05.018

Birkle, C., Pendlebury, D. A., Schnell, J., & Adams, J. (2020). Web of Science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00018

Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., & Daniel, H. D. (2008). Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine diferent variants of the h index using data from biomedicine. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(5), 830–837. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20806

Chia, V. S. (2020). New metrics for assessing high-quality researchers [Unpublished PhD Thesis]. Queensland University of Technology. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/205722/

Codina, L., Morales-Vargas, A., Rodríguez-Martínez, R., & Pérez-Montoro, M. (2020). Uso de Scopus y Web of Science para investigar y evaluar en comunicación social: análisis comparativo y caracterización. index.comunicación, 10(3), 235-261.

      https://doi.org/10.33732/ixc/10/03Usodes

Danesh, F., Rashidi, V., & Mirzaie, M. (2014). Globalization Footprint on Indices of Science and Technology Production. Library and Information Science Research, 3(2), 11-26.

      https://doi.org/10.22067/riis.v3i1.12082 [In Persian].

De Stefano, D., Giordano, G., & Vitale, M. P. (2011). Issues in the analysis of co-authorship networks. Quality & Quantity, 45(5), 1091-1107.

      https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9493-2

Defazio, D., Lockett, A., & Wright, M. (2009). Funding incentives, collaborative dynamics and scientific productivity : Evidence from the EU framework program. Research Policy, 38(2), 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.008

Desai, M., Mehta, R. G., & Rana, D. P. (2023). ScholarRec: a scholars' recommender system that combines scholastic influence and social collaborations in academic social networks. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics, 16(2), 203-2016.

      https://doi.org/10.1007/s41060-022-00345-w

Ehteshami, k. (2018). Python in data science, why Python is the best choice for data science, Daneshjooyar. https://zaya.io/5dy34 (13 January 2021) [In Persian].

Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131-152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0144-7

Elsevier. (n.d.)(2019). Retrieved June 09, 2019, from https://www.elsevier.com/journals/life- sciences/00243205/guide-for-authors.

Fanelli, D., & Larivière, V. (2016). Researchers’ Individual Publication Rate Has Not Increased in a Century. PLOS ONE, 11(3), p. e0149504. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149504

Foroughi, Z., Tahmasabi Limooni, S., & Ghiasi, M. (2019). A Review of the status of existing scientific index and selection of the most appropriate index for valuation of scientific outputs in the field of medical sciences. Clinical excellence, 9(4), 23-33.

      https://ce.mazums.ac.ir/article-1-498-fa.html [In Persian].

Galyani-Moghaddam, G., & Taheri, P. (2015). Mapping co-authorship network and scientific collaborative coefficient of Iranian researchers in the field of aerospace in the Science Citation Index to 2014. Knowledge Retrieval and Semantic Systems, 2(3), 23-42.

      https://jks.atu.ac.ir/article_1606.html?lang=en [In Persian].

Ganguli, R. (2008). A scientometric analysis of recent aerospace research. Current Science, 95(12), 1670-1672. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24105322

Garfield, E., & Welljams-Dorof, A. (1992). Of Nobel class: A citation perspective on high impact research authors. Theoretical Medicine, 13(2), 117-135.

      https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02163625

Glänzel, W. (2006). On the opportunities and limitations of the H-index. Science Focus/Kexue Guancha, 1(1), 10–11.

      https://yunus.hacettepe.edu.tr/~tonta/courses/spring2011/bby704/H_Index_opprtunities.pdf

Guns, R., & Rousseau, R. (2009). Real and rational variants of the h-index and the g-index. Journal of Informetrics, 3, 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2008.11.004

Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2004). Analyzing scientific networks through co-authorship. Hand book of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, 257-276, Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2755-9_12

Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102

Hirsch, J. E. (2019). hα: An index to quantify an individual’s scientific leadership. Scientometrics, 118(2), 673–686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2994-1

Hudson, J. (1996). Trends in multi-authored papers in economics. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(3), 153-158. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.10.3.153

Islamic Parliament Research Center of The Islamic Republic of IRAN (1391). Comprehensive document on the country's aerospace development: 1-24.

      https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/law/show/838896 [In Persian].

Jalalzadeh Asrejadidi, S., Biglu, M. H., & Rafi, A. (2011). The Study of "Matthew Effect" on Science Productions of Iranian Medical Universities on the basis of "Power- law Relationship" in a Five Year Period in the Web of Science. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 26(4), 1106-1120.

      https://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/article_699091.html?lang=en [In Persian].

Khasseh, A. A., Soheili, F., Mousavi Chelak, A. (2017). Co-authorship Network Analysis of iMetrics Researchers. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 1946, 1-17.

      https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1496/

Kaviani, M. (2022). Machine Learning and Deep Learning with Python and R. Tehran: Dibaqaran Tehran Cultural and Artistic Institute.

      https://ketab.ir/book/71d33b34-fc15-4847-aeb7-8e51922623c8 [In Persian].

Kuzhabekova, A. (2011). Impact of Co-Authorship Strategies on Research Productivity: a Social-Network Analysis on Publication in RUSSIAN Cardiology [Unpublished PhD Thesis]. University of Minnesota. https://hdl.handle.net/11299/108109

Masoum Goskere, Y. (2016). Analysis of research productivity of faculty members of chemistry departments of Tehran universities based on scientometric indicators [Unpulished master dissertation]. Shahid University. http://lib.shahed.ac.ir/web/guest/independent  [In Persian].

Mattsson, P., Sundberg, C. J., & Laget, P. (2011). Is correspondence reflected in the author position? A bibliometric study of the relation between corresponding author and byline position. Scientometrics, 87(1), 99-105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0310-9

Mazloumian, A. (2012). Predicting scholars scientific impact. PLOS ONE, 7(11),P. e49246.  https://dx.doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0049246

Mazurek, J. (2018). A modifcation to Hirsch index allowing comparisons across diferent scientifc felds. Current Science, 114: 2238–2239. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1703.05485

McIlroy-Young, R., McLevey, J., & Anderson, J. (2015). metaknowledge: open source software for social networks, bibliometrics, and sociology of knowledge research.

      https://metaknowledge.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ (13 July 2021)

Mirzaee, N., & Noroozi Chakoli, A. (2018). Evaluation of the Research Productivity of Faculty Members of Knowledge and Information Science Departments of State Universities of Tehran by Using Multiple indicators. Library and Information Science Research, 8(1), 5-28. https://doi.org/10.22067/riis.v7i2.54625 [In Persian].

Mohammad Javed, A. (2021). Questioning the Impact of the Impact Factor. A Brief Review and Future Directions. Seminars in Ophthalmology, 91-96.

      https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2021.1922713

Noroozi Chakoli, A., & Rezaei, M. (2014). Scientometrics, International Special Indexes, scientific productivity evaluation. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 30(1), 3-39. https://doi.org/10.35050/JIPM010.2015.049 [In Persian].

Osareh, F. (2006). Collaboration in Astronomy Knowledge Production: a Case Study in ScienceDirect from 2000-2004 In: P. Ingwersen, B. Larsen (Eds), Proceedings of ISSI 2005. The 10th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Stockholm, Sweden.  (24-28 July 2005).

      www.issi-society.org/proceedings/issi_2005/Osareh_ISSI2005.pdf

Pelicioni, L. C., Ribeiro, J. R., Devezas, T., Belderrain, M. C. N., & Melo, F. C. L. (2018). Application of a Bibliometric Tool for Studying Space Technology Trends. J Aerosp Tecnol Manag, 10(830). https://doi.org/10.5028/jatm.v10.830

Perry, M., & Reny, P. J. (2016). How to count citations if you must. American Economic Review, 106(9), 2722–2741. https://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.20140850

PHP (2022). php.net. www.php.net/ (January 2, 2022)

Rahimi Shearbaf, G. h. (2019). Publication of books and articles is one of the main components of science production. Ataf (Monthly of Science, Research and Technology), 40, 1-58.

      https://www.atf.gov.ir/Content/media/filepool3/2020/10/266.pdf?t=637379369862605000 [In Persian].

Ramsden, P. (1994), Describing and Explaining Research Productivity, Higher Education, 28(2), 207-215. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01383729

Ransdell, L. B., Dinger, M. K., Cooke, C., & Beske, S. (2001). Factors related to publication productivity in a sample of female health educators. American journal of health behavior, 25(5), 468–480. https://doi.org/10.5993/ajhb.25.5.4

Rousseau, R., & Ye, F. Y. (2008). A proposal for a dynamic h-type index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(11), 1853–1855.

      https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20890

SadatMoosavi, A., Nooshinfard, F., Hariri, N., & Esmaeil, S. (2018). Does the superior position of countries in co-authorship networks lead to their high citation performance. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 23(1), 51-65.

      https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis.vol23no1.4

Sahel, J. A. (2011). Quality versus quantity: assessing individual research performance. Science Translational Medicine, 3(84). https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3002249

Schreiber, M. (2008). A modification of the h-index: The hm-index accounts for multi-authored manuscripts. Journal of Informetrics, 2(3), 211-216.

      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2008.05.001

Schreiber, M. (2008). To Share the Fame in a Fair Way, Hm Modifies the H for Multi-Authored Manuscripts, New Journal of Physics, 10(4), p. 040201.

      https://dx.doi.org/ 10.1088/1367-2630/10/4/040201

Shayan Majd, M., & Asadi, S. (2016). A Survey on the Establishment of Scientometrics Departments in the Iranian Academic Libraries Based on the SWOT Model: A Case Study of Mashhad Academic Libraries. Library and Information Science Research, 6(1), 203-222. https://doi.org/10.22067/riis.v6i1.46540 [In Persian].

Solomon, J. (2009). Programmers, professors, and parasites: Credit and co-authorship in computer science. Science and Engineering Ethics, 15(4), 467-89.

      https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-009-9119-4

Sotudeh, H., & Yaghtin, M. (2015). A study of scientific productivity of Iranian researchers in different disciplines based on publication per capita indicator during 1991-2011. Journal of Studies in Library and Information Science, 7(15), 65-92.

      https://doi.org/10.22055/slis.2015.11319 [In Persian].

Springer Nature Publishing AG. (n.d.)(2019). Retrieved June 09, 2019, from www.nature.com/srep/journal-policies/editorial-policies#author- responsibilities.

Stanzione, K. A. (2019). Aerospace engineering. Encyclopedia Britannica. Available at:

     https://www.britannica.com/technology/aerospace-engineering (April 25, 2021).

Tol, R. S. J. (2008). A rational, successive g-index applied to economics departments in Ireland. Journal of Informetrics, 2(2), 149-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2008.01.001

Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2008). Generalizing the h- and g-indices. Journal of Informetrics, 2(4), 263–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2008.09.004

Vavilova I. B., Zievako V. S., Pakuliak L. K., & Potapovych L. P.  (2020). Space Science and Technology journal: Statistics and Scientometrics for 1995–2020. Space Science and Technology, 26(6), 094-103. https://doi.org/10.15407/knit2020.06.094

Vaziri, A., Rajabali Baglo, R. (2010). Aerospace engineering of Iran and the world in the mirror of scientology: a study in citation databases. The 10th conference of Iran Aerospace Society, Tehran, Iran (March 10-12, 2010). https://civilica.com/doc/134766/ [In Persian].

WOSCC  (Web of Science Core Collection)(2024). Web of Science Core Collection Help.

https://images.webofknowledge.com/images/help/WOS/hp_subject_category_terms_tasca.
html

Yaminfrooz, M., Gholinia, H. (2015). Multiple h-index: A new scientometric indicator. Electronic Library, 33(3), 547-556. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/EL-07-2013-0137

Yan, E., Ding, Y. (2009). Applying centrality measures to impact analysis: A co-authorship network analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 60(10), 2107-2118. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21128

Zhang, C. T. (2009). The e-index, complementing the h-index for excess citations. PLoS One, 4(5), p. e5429. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005429