Ahmadi, A. (2019). A Study of Raters' Behavior in Scoring L2 Speaking Performance: Using Rater Discussion as a Training Tool. Issues in Language Teaching, 8(1), 195-224. https://doi.org/‌10.22054/ilt.2020.49511.461 [In Persian].

Alterman, R., Carmon, N., & Hill, M. (1984). Integrated evaluation: A synthesis of approaches to the evaluation of broad-aim social programs. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 18(6), 381-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0121(84)90047-8

Angelova-Stanimirova, A. (2023). Critical criteria for evaluation of scientific research activity in Science Direct. Knowledge – International Journal, 58(1), 171-177‌. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371694977

Armand, M., Hemmat, M., Rahmani, M., Fahimifar, S., Behrozi, Talebhaghighi, F., & Zarghani, M. (2022). Identifying and prioritizing the criteria for evaluating printed books in the field of medical sciences. University Textbooks; Research and Writting, 25(49), 237-271. https://doi.org/10.30487/rwab.2021.533853.1462 [In Persian].

Assante, M., Candela, L., Castelli, D., Manghi, P., Pagano, P., & Nazionale, C. (2015). Science 2.0 repositories: time for a change in scholarly communication. D-Lib Magazine, 21(1/2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1045/january2015-assante

Azadi Ahmadabadi, G. (2020). Analyze the role of the country's science, technology and innovation assessment bodies and propose a comprehensive monitoring and evaluation system. Rahyaft, 30(77), 125-140. https://doi.org/10.22034/rahyaft.2020.13823 [In Persian].

Azadi Ahmadabadi, G. (2021). Study and Evaluation of Quantitative and Qualitative Growth of Scientific Outputs of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Scientometrics Research Journal. 8(2), 265-286. https://doi.org/10.22070/RSCI.2022.15445.1546 [In Persian].

Baharifar, a., & Danaeifard, h. (2006). Theory development in social science: evaluation criteria for theoretical science. Modarres human sciences, 10((46) management), 83-102. Https://sid.ir/paper/7019/en. [In Persian].

Bazargan, A. (2001). Educational evaluation: Educational evaluation: concepts, models and operational process. Tehran: Samt. [In Persian].

Bittner, H. (2019). Evaluating the Evaluator. New York: Routledge, http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780367815882-6

Bondi, J., & Bondi, J. (2003). Curriculum development: a guide to practice (3th Edition). Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing Company.

Brankovic, J. (2023). Worlds of Rankings Research. In The Routledge International Handbook of Valuation and SocietyPublisher: Routlege.

Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Thomas, J., Higgins, J. P. T., Deeks, J. J., & Clarke, M. J. (2019). Chapter I: introduction. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version, 5(0), 3-8.

Correia, A.M.R., & Teixeira. J.C. (2005). Reforming scholarly publishing and knowledge communication: From the advent of the scholarly journal to the challenges of open access. Online information review. 29 (4), pp.349-364. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520510617802

Creswell, J. W. (2009) Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. London: Sage.

Dabbagh, R., & azizpoor, p. (2020). Evaluating and ranking the criteria of choosing a supervisor with multi-criteria decision-making techniques "a case study of Urmia University of technology". Iranian journal of engineering education, 22(86), 39-53. https://doi.org/10.22047/ijee.2020.207488.1695 [In Persian].

Davarpanah, M. R. (2010). A scientometric model for the assessment of strength and weakness of scientific disciplines. Library and Information Sciences, 13(3), 9-29. https://lis.aqr-libjournal.ir/article_43509.html [In Persian].

Ebrahimi Dorcheh, E., Mansouri, A., Pashootanizadeh, M., Mirbagheri fard, A., & Shabani, A. (2023). Evaluation policies and criteria of humanities scientific outputs from experts' point of view: a case study of language and literature fields. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 39(1), 63-100. https://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/article_705519.html?lang=en [In Persian].

Emrani, E. (2007). An overview of evaluation indicators of research outputs. Book Quarterly, 71(18), Issue 3, 157-176. https://sid.ir/paper/500021/fa [In Persian].

Farasatkhah, M. (2008). A study of the existing and the desired state of the "scientific evaluation system" in Iran; emphasizing the higher education sector. Journal of science and technology policy, 1(2), 43-58. Https://sid.ir/paper/133069/en [In Persian].

Ghaebi, A., Tajdaran, M., & Fahimifar, S. (2022). The evaluation criteria of Persian academic e-books: Master Studentsâ attitude at Alzahra University. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 27(1), 371-397. https://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/article_699033.html [In Persian].

Ghanadinezhad, F., & Heidari, G. (2021). Methods and Indicators for the Evaluation of Scientific Production in the Humanities and Social Sciences: A Systematic Review. Scientometrics Research Journal, 6(2 (12)), 203-230. https://doi.org/10.22070/rsci.2020.4998.1341 [In Persian].

Gradinarov, P. (2000). An emerging system for scholarly E-publishing: how to make the cake without breaking the E-community eggs. Exploit Interactive، 7. https://thecraft.icaap.org/content/2000/gradinarov/emerge.html

Hakimi, H. (2021). An altmetric evaluation of the researchers' scientific activities in Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Iran. Journal of Studies in Library and Information Science, 13(2), 27-45. https://doi.org/10.22055/slis.2021.37785.1845 [In Persian].

Halevi, G., Moed, H., & Bar-Ilan, J. (2017). Suitability of Google Scholar as a source of scientific information and as a source of data for scientific evaluation—Review of the literature. Journal of informetrics, 11(3), 823-834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.06.005

Hamrahi, A. (2022). Designing a Conceptual Model for the National Scholarly Publication System [Unpublished PhD Thesis]. Iranian Research Institute for Information Science and Technology (IranDoc). https://ganj.irandoc.ac.ir/#/articles/3f20c2850dc7969ca5540428501b8e8d [In Persian].

Harley, D. (2013). Scholarly communication: cultural contexts, evolving models. Science, 342(6154), 80-82. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1243622

Hartgerink, C. H., & Zelst, M. V. (2018). "As-You-Go" Instead of "After-the-Fact": A Network approach to scholarly communication and evaluation. Publications, 6(2), 21 https://doi.org/10.3390/publications6020021

Higgins, J.P.T., Thomas J., Chandler J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page M.J., Welch V.A. (editors). (2023). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.4 Cochrane www.training.cochrane.org/handbook

Hook, D. W., Porter, S. J., & Herzog, C. (2018). Dimensions: building context for search and evaluation. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 3, 23. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2018.00023

Huang, Y., Li, R., Zhang, L., & Sivertsen, G. (2021). A comprehensive analysis of the journal evaluation system in China. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(1), 300-326. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00103

Ibrahim, N., Habacha Chaibi, A., & Ben Ghézala, H. (2022). Comparative study of science evaluation practices. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-12-2021-0293

Jackson, R. (2005). Curriculum access for students with low-incidence disabilities: The promise of universal design for learning. Wakefield, MA: National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum. Retrieved, 3(15), 09. https://sde.ok.gov/sites/ok.gov.sde/files/LowIncidence.pdf

Janavi, E., Moradi, S., & Pakzad, M. (2020). Assessment of Iran's scientific publications based on National Master Plan for Science and Education. Scientometrics Research Journal, 6((Issue 1, spring & summer)), 213-236. http://doi.org/10.22070/rsci.2019.4529.1300 [In Persian].

Jayasundara, C. C. (2020). Beware the Tyranny, Resulted by Impact Factor Mania among the Scientists: A Critical Review. Journal of the University of Ruhuna. 8 (1), 1-17. http://doi.org/10.4038/jur.v8i1.7960

 Johannisson, J. (2015). Open Access scholarly publishing on the competitive market: university management as obstacle and enabler. Culture Unbound, 7(4), 610-617. http://www.cultureunbound.ep.liu.se

Keramatfar, A., Noroozi Chakoli, A., & Esparaein, F. (2015). Quantity or Quality? Comparative assessment of the science production of Iran, Turkey and Malaysia during 1996-2013. Caspian Journal of Scientometrics. 2(1), 33-38. https://doi.org/ 10.22088/acadpub.BUMS.2.1.33 [In Persian].

Keramatfar, A., & Rafiee Khoshnood, M. (2016). Evaluation of scientific outputs of royan institute. Caspian Journal of Scientometrics, 3(1), 36-44. https://doi.org/10.22088/acadpub.BUMS.3.1.36 [In Persian].

Khayyatian Yazdi, M. S., Fartash, K., & Pourasgari, P. (2020). Development of a Framework for Monitoring and Evaluation of Iran's National System of Science, Technology and Innovation. Strategy for Culture, 13(49), 119-154. https://doi.org/10.22034/jsfc.2020.109868 [In Persian].

Khorasani, M., Salami, M., Soheili, F., & Delghandi, F. (2023). Job Competency Criteria for scientometrics specialists: Interviews with Faculty Members and Job Owners. Scientometrics Research Journal, 9(1), 189-210. https://doi.org/10.22070/rsci.2021.13890.1478 [In Persian].

Kim, S., & Oh, S. G. (2019). Extracting and applying evaluation criteria for ontology quality assessment. Library Hi Tech, 37(3), 338-354. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-01-2019-0012

Kreiman, G., & Maunsell, J. H. (2011). Nine criteria for a measure of scientific output. Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 5, 48. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2011.00048

Kriegeskorte, N., Walther, A., & Deca D. (2012). An emerging consensus for open evaluation: 18 visions for the future of scientific publishing. Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 6, p.94. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2012.00094

Krishna, D., Mohan, S. R., Murthy, B. S. N., & Rao, A. R. (2002). Performance evaluation of public research institutes using principal component analysis. Journ al of Scientific & Industrial Research, 61, 940-947. http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/17729

Lamanauskas, V. (2011). The evaluation strategies of integrated science teaching and learning. Problems of Education in the 21st Century‌, 31‌, 5-6. http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/pec/node/556

Madani Boroujeni, S.A., & Nasr, A.R. (2009). Triangulation: a strategy for innovating in educational researches. Journal of educational innovations, 8(30), 53-73. https://noavaryedu.oerp.ir/article_135687.html [In Persian].

Mangiafico, P., & Smith, K. L. (2014). Reason, risk, and reward: models for libraries and other stakeholders in an evolving scholarly publishing ecosystem. Cultural anthropology, 29(2), 216-235. https://doi.org/10.14506/ca29.2.03

Martín-Martín, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Thelwall, M., & López-Cózar E. D. (2018) Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. Journal of informetrics, 12(4), 1160-1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.002

McGuire, H., Anthony, B., Hyde, Z. W., Ashok, A., Bjarnason, B., & Mays, E. (2018). The Scholarly Publishing Ecosystem. An Open Approach to Scholarly Reading and Knowledge Management. Rebus Community. https://press.rebus.community/scholarlyreading/chapter/the-scholarly-publishing-ecosystem/

Mejia, C., Wu, M., Zhang, Y., & Kajikawa, Y. (2021). Exploring topics in bibliometric research through citation networks and semantic analysis. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 6. 742311https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2021.742311

Mohammadbeigi, A., Mohammadsalehi, N., & Aligol, M. (2015). Validity and Reliability of the Instruments and Types of MeasurmentS in Health Applied Researches. JRUMS, 13 (12),1153-1170. http://journal.rums.ac.ir/article-1-2274-fa.html [In Persian].

Moin, M. (2010). A Persian dictionary. Tehran: Zarin. [In Persian].

Mustafa, G., Rauf, A., Ahmed, B., Afzal, M. T., Akhunzada, A., & Alharthi, S. Z. (2023). Comprehensive evaluation of publication and citation metrics for quantifying scholarly influence. IEEE, v. 11, 65759-65774. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3290917

Namdarian, L., & Kalantari, N. (2020). Thematic Analysis of the Evaluation Indicators for Science, Technology, and Innovation of Countries in Iran’s Vision 1404 Document. Rahyaft, 30(77), 45-70. 742311. https://doi.org/10.22034/rahyaft.2020.13819 [In Persian].

Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (2005). Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda. International journal of operations & production management, 25(12), 1228-1263. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570510633639

Nefedov, S. T. (2019). Towards evaluation in scientific reviews (based on German linguistics).

Nelly, A. (2005). The evolution of performance measurement research. International Journal of Operation & Production Management, 25(12), 1267-1277. https://doi.org/10.17516/1997–1370–0494

Nikkhah, M., Sharif, M., & Talebi, H. (2011). A study of the present and possible situations of the application of evaluation indicators of curriculum inputs at the postgraduate level at Isfahan, Shahrekord and Isfahan Industrial universities. New Educational Approaches, 6(1), 75-102. https://nea.ui.ac.ir/article_19062.html [In Persian].

Noroozi Chakoli, A., & Samadi, L. (2010). Comparative Evaluation of Journal Selection Criteria in Journal Citation Reports (PJCR) available at the Reginal Information center for Science and Technology (RICeST) and SID. Library and Information Science, 13(2), 33-60. https://lis.aqr-libjournal.ir/article_43527.html [In Persian].

Noroozi Chakoli, A. (2020). Note from the Editor-in-Chief: Diversity of subject areas and the longstanding issue of evaluation and promotion of faculty members in the humanities and arts. Scientometrics Research Journal, 6(2), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.22070/rsci.2020.1237 [In Persian].

Noroozi Chakoli, A., & Rahjoo, A. (2022). Scientometrics, International Special Indexes, scientific evaluation. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 29(4), 1037-1068. https://doi.org/10.35050/JIPM010.2014.017 [In Persian].

Öchsner, A. (2013). Introduction to scientific publishing: backgrounds, concepts, strategies. Heidelberg: Springer.

Oliver, M. (2000). An introduction to the evaluation of learning technology. Journal of Educational Technology & Society‌, 3(4), 20-30. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.3.4.20     

Orlandi, L.B., Ricciardi, F., Rossignoli, C., and De Marco, M. (2019). Scholarly work in the Internet age: Co-evolving technologies, institutions and workflows. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 4(1), 55-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2017.11.001

Pourabbas, A., Seyednazari, N., Naderfam, S., Hazrati, H., Taghizadieh, A., & Ghafari, R. (2022). Identifying the selection criteria for elite lecturer in medical education: a qualitative study. Depiction of health, 13(3), 286-295. https://doi.org/10.34172/doh.2022.34 [In Persian].

Salim, M. T. H. (2013). Evaluating the Evaluator: A Reflective Approach. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences. 3(7), 16-22. http://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/RHSS/article/view/5577/5690. 3. 16-22

Saxena, A., Thawani, V. Chakrabarty, M., & Gharpure, K. (2013). Scientific evaluation of the scholarly publications. Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics, 4(2), 125-129. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-500X.110894

Schimanski, L. A., & Alperin, J. P. (2018). The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research, 7(1605). https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16493.1

Seong Leem, C., & Kim, I. (2004). An integrated evaluation system based on the continuous improvement model of IS performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems‌, 104(2), 115-128. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570410522080

Shafiee, M. (2021). Evaluating the Performance of Science and Technology Parks through Implementing Organizational Excellence Model. Journal of Innovation Ecosystem, 1 (2), 1-22. https://doi.org/avduj10.22111/INNOECO.2020.35396.1005 [In Persian].

Shahlaee, N. (2016). The Dimensions and Indicators of Assessment for Capability of Science and Technology in the I.R. Iran’sR. Iran’s Military Organizations. Defence Studies, 14(2), 1-27. https://ds.sndu.ac.ir/article_233.html [In Persian].

Shariat, I., Ghanbari, R., Siadati, S. M., & Sedigh, S. (2021). Extracting the Performance Indicators Based on BSC Model for SMEs Residing in Technology Incubators. Roshd -e- Fanavari, 17(65), 35-45. https://doi.org/10.52547/jstpi.20894.17.65.35 [In Persian].

Shojaei, S. M., Fatehrad, M., & Tabatabaeian, S. H. (2014). A Plan for Evaluating Science, Technology and Innovation Policies. Rahyaft, 24(57), 1-15. https://rahyaft.nrisp.ac.ir/article_13556.html [In Persian].

Sivertsen, G. (2019). Understanding and evaluating research and scholarly publishing in the Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH). Data and Information Management, 3(2), 61-71. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00103

Smit, E., & Gruttemeier, H. (2011). Are scholarly publications ready for the data era? Suggestions for best practice guidelines and common standards for the integration of data and publications. New Review of Information Networking, 16(1), 54-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614576.2011.574488

Soltani, M., Elahi, M., Fazli, S., & Rashidi, M.M. (2013). "Providing a comprehensive framework for evaluating the performance of a research institute with an emphasis on human resource management". Strategic Studies in Petroleum and Energy Industry, 5(18), 165 - 194. http://iieshrm.ir/article-1-419-fa.html [In Persian].

Stufflebeam, D.L. (2000). Foundational Models for 21^st Century Program Evaluation. In: Stufflebeam, D.L., Madaus, G.F., Kellaghan, T. (Eds) Evaluation Models. Evaluation in Education and Human Services, 49, Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47559-6_3

Sutherland, W.R. (1977). Impact of technology on scientific publishing. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, (2), 56-58. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.1977.6592323

Tang, Y. M., Chau, K. Y., Kwok, A. P. K., Zhu T., & Ma X. (2022). A systematic review of immersive technology applications for medical practice and education-trends, application areas, recipients, teaching contents, evaluation methods, and performance. Educational Research Review, 35, 100429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100429

Tansley, A. G. (1935). The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms. Ecology, 16(3), 284-307. https://doi.org/10.2307/1930070

Trochim, K. (2006). Introduction to evaluation. Research Methods Knowledge Base. Scientific Research Publishing. http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/qualmeth.php

Trochim, W. M., & Donnelly, J. P. (2001). Research methods knowledge base (Vol. 2). Macmillan Publishing Company, New York: Atomic Dog Pub.

Tsujimoto, M., Kajikawa, Y., Tomita, J., & Matsumoto, Y. (2018). A review of the ecosystem concept—towards coherent ecosystem design. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.032

Udupi, P. K., Dattana, V., Netravathi P. S., & Pandey J. (2023). Predicting Global Ranking of Universities across the world using Machine learning regression technique. Science and Technology Ethics and Human Future (STEHF).  156, 244-250‌. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202315604001

Visagie, S. (2013). Review of the book Scholarly communication in science and engineering research in higher education by Wei Wei (Eds). South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science (SAJLIS (, 72(2(. https://doi.org/10.7553/72-2-1136

Vosough, F., Ahmadi, G., Hassanmoradi, N., & Mohammaddavoodi, A. (2021). Identifying the native dimensions, components and indicators of research performance evaluation in university (A case study: Islamic Azad University in Tehran). Journal of Management and Planning In Educational System, 14(1), 13-42. https://doi.org/10.52547/MPES.14.1.13 [In Persian].

Webb, E. J., Campbell, D. T., Schwartz, R. D., & Sechrest, L. (1966) Unobtrusive Measures: Nonreactive Research in the Social Sciences. Chicago: Rand McNally https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1966-06543-000

Wouters, P., Zahedi, Z., & Costas, R. (2019). Social media metrics for new research evaluation. Springer handbook of science and technology indicators‌, 687-713. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_26

Xia, J. (2017). Scholarly Communication at the Crossroads in China. Chandos Publishing. 1-170.

 Xu, J., Li, Z., Shen, W., & Lev, B. (2013). Multi-attribute comprehensive evaluation of individual research output based on published research papers. Knowledge-Based Systems, 43, 135-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2013.01.029

Yaghoubi, N. M., & Shukuhy, J. (2022). Provide a framework to assess the continuing effectiveness of information systems in defense agencies using fuzzy approach. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 30(4), 1173-1196. https://doi.org/10.35050/JIPM010.2015.024 [In Persian].

Yazdani, K., Rahimi-Movaghar, A., Nedjat, S., Ghalichi, L., & Khalili, M. (2015). A 5-year Scientometrics analysis of research centers affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 29, 206. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26157724/