Abbasi, F., & Biglu, M. (2012). The Relationship between Quantity and Quality Indicators of Publications by Iranian Universities of Medical Sciences in Web of Science. Health Information Management, 8(6), 842-851. [In Persian]

Abramo, G., D'Angelo, C.A. (2014). How do you define and measure research productivity? Scientometrics, 101(2), 1129-1144. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1810.12830

Albornoz M., Osorio, L. (2018). Rankings de universidades: calidad global y contextos locales. Revista CTS 37(13). http://www.revistacts.net/volumen-13-numero-37.

Almasi, Mohammad Hossein. (1389). The nature and elements of soft power. Tehran: Saghi publishing house. [In Persian]

Anjana, R. C. (2018). Identification of criteria for assessing the quality of research. American Journal of Educational Research, 6(6), 592-595. DOI: 10.12691/education-6-6-2

Azadi Ahmadabadi, Ghasem. (2019). Explanation Concepts, Policies and Indicators in Scientific, Technological and Innovation Leadership. Research project, research group for policy evaluation and monitoring of science, technology and innovation, National Research Institute for Science Policy (NRISP). [In Persian]

Babić, D., Kutlača, Đ., Živković, L., Štrbac, D., & Semenčenko, D. (2016). Evaluation of the quality of scientific performance of the selected countries of Southeast Europe. Scientometrics, 106(1), 405-434.

Bai, X., Pan, H., Hou, J., Guo, T., Lee, I., & Xia, F. (2020). Quantifying success in science: An overview. IEEE Access, 8, 123200-123214.  DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3007709

Begum, M., Lewison, G., Sommariva, S., Ciani, O., Tarricone, R., & Sullivan, R. (2017). European diabetes research and its funding, 2002–2013. Diabetic Medicine, 34(10), 1354-1360. DOI: 10.1111/dme.13411

Chavarro D, Ràfols I and Tang P (2018). To what extent is inclusion in the Web of Science an indicator of journal ‘quality’? Research Evaluation, 27(2): 106–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3321197

Chavarro, D. (2020). Exploring research evaluation from a sustainable development perspective. Transforming Research Excellence. DOI:10.5281/zenodo.3603897

Coastas, R. and Bordons, M. (2007). The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level. Econ Papers, 1(3), 193-203. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2007.02.001

Da Luz, M. P., Marques-Portella, C., Mendlowicz, M., Gleiser, S., Coutinho, E. S. F., & Figueira, I. (2008). Institutional h-index: The performance of a new metric in the evaluation of Brazilian Psychiatric Post-graduation Programs. Scientometrics, 77(2), 361-368. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-1964-9

Daraio, C., Moed, H. F. (2011). Is Italian science declining? Research Policy, 40, 1380–1392. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.06.013

Department of National Security Studies, Higher National Defense University. (1390). Consolidation of authority, strategies and trends. Tehran: Da'a publishing house. [In Persian]

Ebrahimi, S., & Jowkar, A. (2010). The Situation of Scientific Publications of Iran’s Universities of Medical Science on the Basis of Scientometrics Qualitative and Quantitative Indicators 1997-2006. Health Information Management, 7(3), 270-282. [In Persian]

Erfanmanesh, M., Jahromi, R. B., Hosseini, E., & Gholamhosseinzadeh, Z. (2013). Scientific productivity, impact and collaboration of the top Asian countries in Scopus during 1996-2010. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 7(1), 97-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/09737766.2013.802632

European Commission (2013). Country and Regional Scientific Production Profiles. https://ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-union/pdf/scientific-production-profiles.pdf,

Farazkish, Mahdia. (1400). Designing an index-based evaluation system in the field of research, technology and innovation in the seventh program. In: Research, technology and innovation in the 7th development plan: studies, analysis and suggestions. Tehran: National Research Institute for Science Policy (NRISP). [In Persian]

Fassin, Y. (2021). The emergence of China in international academic management research: A nuanced analysis following the new f²-methodology. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 26(2), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis.vol26no2.1

Glänzel, W., Thijs, B., & Debackere, K. (2016). Productivity, performance, efficiency, impact. What do we measure anyway? Some comments on the paper “A farewell to the MNCS and like size-independent indicators” by Abramo and D’Angelo. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 658–660.

Habibzadeh F. (2011). Geopolitical changes and trends in Middle Eastern countries' contributions to world science over the past three decades. Arch Iran Med, 14(5):310-11.

Hansson, F. (2010). Dialogue in or with the peer review? Evaluating research organizations in order to promote organizational learning. Science and Public Policy, 37(4), 239-251. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234210X496600.

Huang, D. W. (2016). Positive correlation between quality and quantity in academic journals. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 329-335. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.002

Janavi, E., Moradi, S., & Pakzad, M. (2020). Assessment of Iran's scientific publications based on National Master Plan for Science and Education. Scientometrics Research Journal, 6(11), 213-236. doi: 10.22070/rsci.2019.4529.1300. [In Persian]

Karamourzov, R. (2012). The development trends of science in the CIS countries on the basis of some scientometric indicators. Scientometrics, 91(1), 1-14. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-011-0592-6

Keramatfar A, Noroozi chakoli A, Esparaein F. Quantity or Quality? Comparative assessment of the science production of Iran, Turkey and Malaysia during 1996-2013. CJS 2015; 2 (1):33-38. [In Persian]

King, D. A. (2004). The scientific impact of nations. Nature, 430(6997), 311-316. DOI: 10.1038/430311a

Klavans, R., & Boyack, K. (2010). Toward an objective, reliable and accurate method for measuring research leadership. Scientometrics, 82(3): 539-553. DOI: 10.1038/430311a

Kpolovie, P. J. (2018). Multiple Prediction of Research Productivity: H-Index. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 5(11)110-135. DoI:10.14738/assrj.511.5518.

Kutlača, D., Babić, D., Živković, L., & Štrbac, D. (2015). Analysis of quantitative and qualitative indicators of SEE countries scientific output. Scientometrics, 102(1), 247-265. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-014-1290-y

Li, E. Y., Liaoa, C. H., & Yen, H. R. (2013). Co-authorship networks and research impact: A social capital perspective. Research Policy, 42, 1515–1530. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.06.012

Mantovani A, Rinaldi E, Zusi C. (2020). Country rankings on the scientific production in endocrinology and diabetology. Explor Med.; 1:307-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37349/emed.2020.00020

Martin, B. R. (2012). The evolution of science policy and innovation studies. Research policy, 41(7), 1219-1239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.012

Martin, B. R., Nightingale, P., & Alfredo Yegros-Yegros, A. (2012). Science and technology studies: Exploring the knowledge base. Research Policy, 41, 1182–1204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.010

Rijcke SD, Wouters PF, Rushforth AD, Franssen TP and Hammarfelt B (2016). Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use—a literature review. Research Evaluation, 25(2): 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv038

Rogers, D. W., & Hendee, W. R. (2008). Scientific citation indices are useful in evaluating medical physicists for promotion and tenure. Colin G. Orton and William R. Hendee, 529. DOI: 10.1118/1.2142597

Whitley, R., Gläser, J. (eds) (2007). The Changing Governance of the Sciences: The Advent of Research Evaluation Systems. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6746-4_1

Yaghubi Glowardi, Mohammad Taher. (1390). Science and technology education with an emphasis on the Islamic world, Kish: Science and technology conference with an emphasis on the Islamic world. [In Persian]